Isn't that basically the problem of the inner traffic sender, not the
problem of the tunnel that is carrying the traffic?
Asking tunnel's to solve the problem of applications with undesirable
behavior seems backwards.
Yours,
Joel
On 1/14/14 10:20 AM, Eggert, Lars wrote:
On 2014-1-14, at 15:20, Stewart Bryant <stbryant(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com> wrote:
Yes, the inner (real) transport header is the only meaningful place
to apply congestion avoidance.
But what if the inner traffic isn't congestion controlled?
Lars