Re: Proposed Changes to IAOC Communications Plan; Request for Community

On 2014-02-06 04:56, Randy Bush wrote:
> > > > > B.  Proposed Additions to the Plan
> > > > > > > > >      5.4.1 Subpoenas and Other Legal Requests
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >      All subpoenas and other legal requests received by the IAOC
> > > > > > > > >      or the IETF will be published on the IAOC website together
> > > > > > > > >      with their responses.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >      Reason for Change:  Greater transparency.
> > > > > > > Some such requests may include the requirement that they not be
> > > > > > > revealed.
> > > > > they should be rejected out of hand.  "we can not read your email"
> > > Does that work for National Security Letters too?
> i was thinking of them specifically.  and yes, i have gone to jail for
> my political beliefs in the past and would do so again.
A "we have problems here" response for me would trigger a request to
review under what jurisdiction IETF operate.

We are a standards body that writes documents.

Not an operator or such that deals with operational issues.

   Patrik

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature