ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: calls for discussion

2014-02-12 02:02:56
Sorry, I've not had a chance to read your mail, but perhaps we could
discuss it in the session in London?
On 12 Feb 2014 07:37, "Randy Bush" <randy(_at_)psg(_dot_)com> wrote:

maybe the result would be slightly improved if chairs did not call
for presentations at wg meetings, but instead called for items
needing face to face discussion?
I try but it's an uphill struggle.  I'm hoping against hope that one
of the things that comes out of the wg chairs training session on
consensus is a better understanding of why this is such a big deal.

we waste immense amounts of time of the literate in a hopeless attempt
to insert clue into the lazy or illiterate.

just say a hard no to "i want to present draft-..."  has your draft been
discussed on the mailing list and has shown serious divergence of views
such that facetime is really needed?

randy


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>