AB,
As Dave Crocker wisely advised, there are situations in which it is best to
ignore the correspondent.
Yours Irrespectively,
John
From: ietf [mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Abdussalam
Baryun
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 5:44 PM
To: John C Klensin
Cc: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: Ad hominems
John,
The person have been in the IETF meeting remotely participating, and the
current WGs agenda is not known how it was organised so the suggestion was
based on past and current facts.
Readers may assume the person is not experience but why do they assume that
meeting don't need improvement or why they assume that current meeting agenda
cannot be commented on or why they assume that IETF meeting are perfectly
organised.
IMHO If the comment was from some one else, many will change their mind just
because he/she is popular experience not because of any other type of
experience.
AB
AB