Speak to Dave.
Yours Irrespectively,
John
-----Original Message-----
From: l(_dot_)wood(_at_)surrey(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk
[mailto:l(_dot_)wood(_at_)surrey(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 6:22 PM
To: John E Drake; john-ietf(_at_)jck(_dot_)com
Cc: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: RE: Ad hominems
As Dave Crocker wisely advised, there are situations in which it is best to
ignore the correspondent.
Of course, ignoring the correspondent, rather than the correspondence, would
be an ad-hominem response. Which would be unacceptable. No?
Lloyd Wood
http://about.me/lloydwood
________________________________________
From: ietf [ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of John E Drake
[jdrake(_at_)juniper(_dot_)net]
Sent: 26 February 2014 01:46
To: Abdussalam Baryun; John C Klensin
Cc: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: RE: Ad hominems
AB,
As Dave Crocker wisely advised, there are situations in which it is best to
ignore the correspondent.
Yours Irrespectively,
John