Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working languag

On Mar 10, 2014, at 6:18 AM, <l(_dot_)wood(_at_)surrey(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk> 
<l(_dot_)wood(_at_)surrey(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk> wrote:

Je ne sais pas vraiment comment beaucoup plus de ce que je peux prendre.


Quel est le son d'une seule main qui applaudit?

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, (continued) Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Phillip Hallam-Baker Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Jari Arkko Stopping at two (was: Two official work languages is smarter), Andrew Sullivan Re: Stopping at two (was: Two official work languages is smarter), Chaitanya Dhareshwar Re: Stopping at two (was: Two official work languages is smarter), Yoav Nir Re: Stopping at two (was: Two official work languages is smarter), Klaas Wierenga (kwiereng) Re: Stopping at two (was: Two official work languages is smarter), Riccardo Bernardini RE: Stopping at two (was: Two official work languages is smarter), l.wood Re: Stopping at two, Juliao Braga RE: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, l.wood Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Ted Lemon <= RE: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, l.wood

Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language