Which does bring us back to the question of how to deal with "bad
actors" (or at least "irresponsible actors" or "uncooperative actors")
within a cooperative governance framework. Sigh.... Miles
Seth Johnson wrote:
They're forcing adoption -- while folks have not been addressing this
piece of the inter-governmental frame. :-)
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Miles Fidelman
<mfidelman(_at_)meetinghouse(_dot_)net <mailto:mfidelman(_at_)meetinghouse(_dot_)net>> wrote:
Dave Crocker wrote:
On 4/14/2014 6:45 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
I thought that standard operating procedure in the IT industry
was: if you roll something out and it causes serious
breakage to
some of your users, you roll it back as soon as possible.
Why hasn't Yahoo rolled back its 'reject' policy by now?
As the most-recent public statement from Yahoo, this might
have some tidbits in it that are relevant to your question:
http://yahoo.tumblr.com/post/82426971544/an-update-on-our-dmarc-policy-to-protect-our-users
You mean the part where they say:
"We know there are about 30,000 affected email sending services,
but we also know that the change needed to support our new DMARC
policy is important and not terribly difficult to implement. We
have detailed the changes we are requiring here
<http://yahoomail.tumblr.com/post/82426900353/yahoo-dmarc-policy-change-what-should-senders-do>."
I.e., 'not our problem'
Miles Fidelman
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra