IAB Chair <iab-chair(_at_)iab(_dot_)org> wrote:
> This is a call for review of "Architectural Considerations in Smart
> Object Networking" prior to potential approval as an IAB stream RFC.
> The document is available for inspection here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-iab-smart-object-architecture/
> The Call for Review will last until 24 September 2014. Please send
> comments to iab(_at_)iab(_dot_)org.
I read it.
I found nothing surprising in it. I also didn't find anything to disagree
with, but on the other hand, I am not sure I found anything specific that I
could disagree with.
I think it is a nice document, and details some useful network patterns,
so in that, it is very useful. Are there any other patterns that we missed?
I can't think of any. I did say that in the Device-to-Device pattern,
that there was some implicit assumption that the wireless network was a
single hop, and had no routers, and therefore devices/manufacturers have to
agree on a layer 1/2. The ability to route is later mentioned in other
sections.
I would have liked better (cooler...) terms for sections 2.1/2.2./2.3/2.4,
but I don't have any to offer.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF(_at_)sandelman(_dot_)ca>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
pgpLQdrhVB9aR.pgp
Description: PGP signature