IETF Discussion (date)
August 31, 2014
- Re: The IETF should run an IMAPS server for its lists, Nico Williams, 14:58
- Re: The IETF should run an IMAPS server for its lists, John C Klensin, 12:05
- Re: Opportunistic Lost (was Re: draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-04), Theodore Ts'o, 11:21
- Opportunistic Lost (was Re: draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-04), Abdussalam Baryun, 05:40
- Re: The IETF should run an IMAPS server for its lists, S Moonesamy, 05:23
August 30, 2014
- RE: Opportunistic Lost (was Re: draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-04), l.wood, 20:18
- Re: Call for Review of draft-iab-smart-object-architecture-04.txt, "Architectural Considerations in Smart Object Networking", Michael Richardson, 16:08
- Re: Call for Review of draft-iab-smart-object-architecture-04.txt, "Architectural Considerations in Smart Object Networking", Michael Richardson, 16:04
- Re: Opportunistic Lost (was Re: draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-04), Stephen Farrell, 14:44
- Opportunistic Lost (was Re: draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-04), Dave Crocker, 13:08
- Re: The IETF should run an IMAPS server for its lists, John C Klensin, 12:03
- Re: The IETF should run an IMAPS server for its lists, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:58
- Re: The IETF should run an IMAPS server for its lists, Russ Housley, 10:33
- Re: Connecting code (open source and proprietary) with IETF standards, Abdussalam Baryun, 04:43
- No meetings on Hawaii in future, Christer Holmberg, 03:41
August 29, 2014
- Re: Is it possible for individuals to avoid being monitored by Government agencies?, Dave Crocker, 21:36
- The IETF should run an IMAPS server for its lists, Nico Williams, 17:04
- Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic], Andrew G. Malis, 16:49
- Re: Is it possible for individuals to avoid being monitored by Government agencies?, manning bill, 16:04
- Re: Is it possible for individuals to avoid being monitored by Government agencies?, Ted Lemon, 15:53
- Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic], Brian E Carpenter, 15:10
- Re: gmail users read on... [technical subtopic], Brian E Carpenter, 15:05
- Is it possible for individuals to avoid being monitored by Government agencies?, Linda Dunbar, 13:25
- Re: gmail users read on..., Phillip Hallam-Baker, 13:18
- NOMCOM 2014 - Call for Nominations, NomCom Chair 2014, 11:14
- Re: gmail users read on..., joel jaeggli, 11:11
- Re: gmail users read on..., Ted Faber, 11:10
- Re: gmail users read on..., TJ, 11:10
- Re: gmail users read on..., Paul Hoffman, 11:06
- Re: gmail users read on..., Riccardo Bernardini, 11:03
- Re: gmail users read on..., Ross Finlayson, 10:54
- Re: gmail users read on..., TJ, 10:41
- Re: gmail users read on..., Tim Bray, 10:38
- Re: gmail users read on..., Ted Faber, 10:37
- Re: gmail users read on..., Ross Finlayson, 10:36
- RE: gmail users read on..., l.wood, 10:21
- Re: gmail users read on..., Mary Barnes, 10:01
- Re: gmail users read on..., Michael Richardson, 09:54
- Re: gmail users read on..., Ross Finlayson, 09:49
- Re: gmail users read on..., Rich Kulawiec, 07:11
- Re: gmail users read on..., Andrew G. Malis, 06:50
- Re: Call for Review of draft-iab-smart-object-architecture-04.txt, "Architectural Considerations in Smart Object Networking", Steve Crocker, 06:33
- Re: Call for Review of draft-iab-smart-object-architecture-04.txt, "Architectural Considerations in Smart Object Networking", Ralph Droms, 06:13
- Re: Call for Review of draft-iab-smart-object-architecture-04.txt, "Architectural Considerations in Smart Object Networking", Ralph Droms, 06:08
- gmail users read on..., Brian E Carpenter, 00:06
August 27, 2014
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-forces-model-extension-03, Ben Campbell, 16:26
- Re: Call for Review of draft-iab-smart-object-architecture-04.txt, "Architectural Considerations in Smart Object Networking", George, Wes, 14:56
- Re: [jose] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-jose-json-web-signature-31, Kathleen Moriarty, 13:55
- RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-jose-json-web-signature-31, Mike Jones, 13:30
- Call for Review of draft-iab-smart-object-architecture-04.txt, "Architectural Considerations in Smart Object Networking", IAB Chair, 13:19
- Re: draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-04, Michael Richardson, 12:40
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-jose-json-web-signature-31, Jari Arkko, 12:07
- RE: [tsvwg] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-pcn-09, karagian, 11:53
- Re: draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-04, Paul Wouters, 10:49
- Re: Hawaii Block - going, going, gone for Saturday, Jari Arkko, 09:57
- Re: Hawaii Block - going, going, gone for Saturday, Chris Grundemann, 07:34
- Re: draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-04, Stephen Farrell, 04:58
- RE: draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-04, l.wood, 02:17
August 26, 2014
- draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-04, Dave Crocker, 23:15
- Re: Hawaii Block - going, going, gone for Saturday, Brian E Carpenter, 18:38
- Re: Hawaii Block - going, going, gone for Saturday, Tim Chown, 17:13
- Re: Hawaii Block - going, going, gone for Saturday, John Levine, 16:33
- RE: Hawaii Block - going, going...., Christer Holmberg, 15:03
- Re: Hawaii Block - going, going...., Thomas Clausen, 14:11
- Re: Hawaii Block - going, going...., Chris Elliott, 14:04
- RE: Hawaii Block - going, going...., Christer Holmberg, 14:03
- Re: Hawaii Block - going, going...., joel jaeggli, 13:45
- Re: Hawaii Block - going, going...., Dave Crocker, 13:39
- Re: Hawaii Block - going, going...., joel jaeggli, 13:26
- Re: Hawaii Block - going, going...., Thomas Clausen, 13:18
- RE: Hawaii Block - going, going...., Christer Holmberg, 13:07
- Re: Hawaii Block - going, going...., Greg Shepherd, 10:58
- Re: Hawaii Block - going, going...., Stewart Bryant, 10:42
- Re: Is traffic analysis really a target (was Re: [saag] Is opportunistic unauthenticated encryption a waste of time?), Eric Burger, 05:54
- Re: Is traffic analysis really a target (was Re: [saag] Is opportunistic unauthenticated encryption a waste of time?), Nico Williams, 00:44
August 25, 2014
- Re: Is traffic analysis really a target (was Re: [saag] Is opportunistic unauthenticated encryption a waste of time?), Brian E Carpenter, 19:10
- Re: Vacation locations (was: Re: [Recentattendees] Were You Planning a Vacation Around IETF91 Trip?), Jari Arkko, 16:47
- Re: [saag] DANE should be more prominent (Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment), Peter Gutmann, 11:17
- Re: Vacation locations, Michael Richardson, 10:50
- Re: Vacation locations (was: Re: [Recentattendees] Were You Planning a Vacation Around IETF91 Trip?), John C Klensin, 09:26
- Re: Vacation locations (was: Re: [Recentattendees] Were You Planning a Vacation Around IETF91 Trip?), Jari Arkko, 08:52
- RE: [saag] Is opportunistic unauthenticated encryption a waste of time?, Hosnieh Rafiee, 03:09
- Re: Hawaii Block - going, going...., Murray S. Kucherawy, 02:37
- Re: Is traffic analysis really a target (was Re: [saag] Is opportunistic unauthenticated encryption a waste of time?), Ted Hardie, 02:20
- Re: [saag] Is traffic analysis really a target (was Re: Is opportunistic unauthenticated encryption a waste of time?), Henry B (Hank) Hotz, CISSP, 00:22
August 24, 2014
- Re: [saag] Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>), Henry B (Hank) Hotz, CISSP, 22:11
- Re: Is traffic analysis really a target (was Re: [saag] Is opportunistic unauthenticated encryption a waste of time?), Mark Andrews, 21:36
- Re: [saag] Is opportunistic unauthenticated encryption a waste of time?, Fernando Gont, 19:57
- Re: Vacation locations, Lou Berger, 19:14
- Re: [saag] Is opportunistic unauthenticated encryption a waste of time?, joel jaeggli, 19:10
- Re: [saag] Is opportunistic unauthenticated encryption a waste of time?, Fernando Gont, 18:59
- Re: [saag] Is opportunistic unauthenticated encryption a waste of time?, joel jaeggli, 15:43
- Re: Is traffic analysis really a target (was Re: [saag] Is opportunistic unauthenticated encryption a waste of time?), Brian E Carpenter, 15:02
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-jose-json-web-signature-31, Russ Housley, 14:24
- Re: [saag] Is opportunistic unauthenticated encryption a waste of time?, Dave Crocker, 14:16
- Re: Is traffic analysis really a target (was Re: [saag] Is opportunistic unauthenticated encryption a waste of time?), Michael StJohns, 14:06
- Re: Is traffic analysis really a target (was Re: [saag] Is opportunistic unauthenticated encryption a waste of time?), Eric Burger, 11:32
- Re: [saag] Is opportunistic unauthenticated encryption a waste of time?, Fernando Gont, 09:13
August 23, 2014
- Re: [saag] Is opportunistic unauthenticated encryption a waste of time?, Stephen Farrell, 16:33
- Re: [saag] Is opportunistic unauthenticated encryption a waste of time?, Viktor Dukhovni, 16:06
- RE: [saag] Is opportunistic unauthenticated encryption a waste of time?, Bernard Aboba, 16:05
- Re: [saag] Is opportunistic unauthenticated encryption a waste of time?, Stephen Farrell, 15:34
- RE: [saag] Is opportunistic unauthenticated encryption a waste of time?, Bernard Aboba, 15:28
- Re: The challenges of survey research (was Re: vacation locations), Abdussalam Baryun, 14:18
- Re: Vacation locations (was: Re: [Recentattendees] Were You Planning a Vacation Around IETF91 Trip?), Ted Lemon, 12:43
- The challenges of survey research (was Re: vacation locations), Dave Crocker, 12:28
- Re: Vacation locations, Dave Crocker, 11:31
- Re: Vacation locations, Andrew G. Malis, 10:59
- RE: The ability to automatically upgrade a reference to HTTPS fromHTTP, Chaitanya D, 10:33
- Re: The ability to automatically upgrade a reference to HTTPS from HTTP, Paul Hoffman, 10:05
- Re: [saag] DANE should be more prominent (Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment), Kathleen Moriarty, 06:20
- Re: Vacation locations, Eliot Lear, 04:13
- Re: Vacation locations, Stewart Bryant (stbryant), 03:07
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control-09, Peter Yee, 02:07
- Re: Fwd: The ability to automatically upgrade a reference to HTTPS from HTTP, Eliot Lear, 02:04
August 22, 2014
- Re: Vacation locations, Dave Crocker, 23:08
- Re: [saag] Is opportunistic unauthenticated encryption a waste of time?, Nico Williams, 23:06
- RE: [saag] Is opportunistic unauthenticated encryption a waste of time?, Christian Huitema, 22:58
- Re: [saag] Is opportunistic unauthenticated encryption a waste of time?, Theodore Ts'o, 22:04
- RE: [saag] Is opportunistic unauthenticated encryption a waste of time?, Bernard Aboba, 21:14
- Re: Vacation locations, Chris Elliott, 18:37
- RE: [saag] DANE should be more prominent (Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment), l.wood, 18:28
- Re: Fwd: The ability to automatically upgrade a reference to HTTPS from HTTP, Nico Williams, 17:02
- Re: Fwd: The ability to automatically upgrade a reference to HTTPS from HTTP, Viktor Dukhovni, 16:55
- Re: Fwd: The ability to automatically upgrade a reference to HTTPS from HTTP, Kathleen Moriarty, 16:50
- Re: Fwd: The ability to automatically upgrade a reference to HTTPS from HTTP, Nico Williams, 16:37
- Re: Vacation locations (was: Re: [Recentattendees] Were You Planning a Vacation Around IETF91 Trip?), John C Klensin, 15:53
- Re: There should be a design pattern, not patterns., Phillip Hallam-Baker, 15:24
- Re: [saag] DANE should be more prominent (Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment), Stephen Kent, 15:05
- Re: [saag] Adept Encryption: Was: DANE should be more prominent (Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment), Stephen Kent, 14:52
- Re: [saag] : Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment, Stephen Kent, 14:46
- Re: [saag] Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>), Benjamin Kaduk, 14:30
- Fwd: The ability to automatically upgrade a reference to HTTPS from HTTP, Tim Bray, 14:17
- Re: Vacation locations (was: Re: [Recentattendees] Were You Planning a Vacation Around IETF91 Trip?), Ole Jacobsen, 14:16
- Re: Vacation locations, Melinda Shore, 13:56
- Re: Vacation locations (was: Re: [Recentattendees] Were You Planning a Vacation Around IETF91 Trip?), Michael StJohns, 13:37
- Re: Vacation locations, Lou Berger, 13:04
- Vacation locations (was: Re: [Recentattendees] Were You Planning a Vacation Around IETF91 Trip?), John C Klensin, 12:40
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 91 - Registration is now open!, David Conrad, 12:33
- Re: Hawaii Block - going, going...., Spencer Dawkins at IETF, 11:59
- RE: Hawaii Block - going, going...., Andrew Allen, 10:16
- RE: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-forces-model-extension-03, Haleplidis Evangelos, 10:07
- Re: [saag]: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment, Paul Wouters, 09:13
- Re: [saag] Is opportunistic unauthenticated encryption a waste of time?, Viktor Dukhovni, 09:00
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 91 - Registration is now open!, Ted Lemon, 08:06
- Re: Adept Encryption: Was: [saag] DANE should be more prominent (Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment), Stephen Farrell, 07:14
- Re: There should be a design pattern, not patterns., Tom Thorogood, 06:55
- Re: Hawaii Block - going, going...., Lou Berger, 05:51
- RE: [Recentattendees] IETF 91 - Registration is now open!, Leaf Yeh, 03:16
- RE: [saag] Adept Encryption: Was: DANE should be more prominent (Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment), l.wood, 03:12
- Re: Hawaii Block - going, going...., Sandra Murphy, 03:08
- Re: Hawaii Block - going, going...., Ben Campbell, 00:51
- Re: Hawaii Block - going, going...., Ben Campbell, 00:46
- Re: Hawaii Block - going, going...., Ben Campbell, 00:45
- Re: [saag] Adept Encryption: Was: DANE should be more prominent (Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment), Nico Williams, 00:42
- Re: [saag]: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment, Viktor Dukhovni, 00:35
- RE: Adept Encryption: Was: [saag] DANE should be more prominent (Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment), l.wood, 00:25
August 21, 2014
- Hawaii Block - going, going...., Michael StJohns, 23:56
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 91 - Registration is now open!, Brian E Carpenter, 23:49
- Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-pcn-09, Robert Sparks, 15:44
- Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-10, Peter Yee, 15:16
- Re: Adept Encryption: Was: [saag] DANE should be more prominent (Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment), Nico Williams, 14:36
- RE: Adept Encryption: Was: [saag] DANE should be more prominent (Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment), Christian Huitema, 14:23
- Re: [saag] Adept Encryption: Was: DANE should be more prominent (Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment), Nico Williams, 11:28
- Re: Adept Encryption: Was: [saag] DANE should be more prominent (Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment), Viktor Dukhovni, 11:15
- Re: Adept Encryption: Was: [saag] DANE should be more prominent (Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment), Viktor Dukhovni, 11:04
- Re: Adept Encryption: Was: [saag] DANE should be more prominent (Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment), Stephen Kent, 10:35
- RE: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-forces-model-extension-03, Haleplidis Evangelos, 10:03
- Re: [Gen-art] Genart LC review draft-ietf-paws-protocol-14 (was Re: Second Last Call: <draft-ietf-paws-protocol-14.txt> (Protocol to Access White-Space (PAWS) Databases) to Proposed Standard), Jari Arkko, 09:16
- Re: Adept Encryption: Was: [saag] DANE should be more prominent (Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment), Phillip Hallam-Baker, 07:25
- Re: Adept Encryption: Was: [saag] DANE should be more prominent (Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment), Stephen Farrell, 06:09
- RE: Adept Encryption: Was: [saag] DANE should be more prominent (Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment), l.wood, 05:12
- Re: There should be a design pattern, not patterns., Mark Andrews, 01:44
August 20, 2014
- Re: Adept Encryption: Was: [saag] DANE should be more prominent (Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment), Scott Kitterman, 23:38
- Re: Adept Encryption: Was: [saag] DANE should be more prominent (Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment), Dave Crocker, 22:34
- Re: Adept Encryption: Was: [saag] DANE should be more prominent (Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment), Nico Williams, 20:28
- Re: Adept Encryption: Was: [saag] DANE should be more prominent (Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment), Stephen Farrell, 20:18
- Re: Adept Encryption: Was: [saag] DANE should be more prominent (Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment), Paul Wouters, 20:03
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-forces-model-extension-03, Ben Campbell, 17:22
- Adept Encryption: Was: [saag] DANE should be more prominent (Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment), Phillip Hallam-Baker, 17:13
- RE: There should be a design pattern, not patterns., Mike Jones, 12:54
- Re: Flollow up from Admin Plenary, George, Wes, 12:22
- There should be a design pattern, not patterns., Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:59
- Fwd: Re: [saag] DANE should be more prominent (Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment), Stephen Farrell, 10:22
- Re: [saag] DANE should be more prominent (Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment), Stephen Kent, 10:02
- Re: IETF 91 Registration, Paul Wouters, 09:15
- Re: IETF 91 Registration, Marcia Beaulieu, 09:14
- IETF 91 Registration, Yoav Nir, 09:00
- Re: [saag] Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>), Eliot Lear, 05:41
- Re: Flollow up from Admin Plenary, Yoav Nir, 04:10
- Re: Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>), t.p., 03:19
August 19, 2014
- Re: Flollow up from Admin Plenary, Nico Williams, 20:09
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-forces-model-extension-03, Ben Campbell, 18:03
- Re: Flollow up from Admin Plenary, Kathleen Moriarty, 17:11
- Re: Flollow up from Admin Plenary, Walter Pienciak, 16:50
- Re: Flollow up from Admin Plenary, Viktor Dukhovni, 16:08
- Re: [saag] DANE should be more prominent (Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment), Benjamin Kaduk, 16:03
- Re: [saag] DANE should be more prominent (Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment), Viktor Dukhovni, 15:54
- Re: Flollow up from Admin Plenary, Kathleen Moriarty, 15:53
- Re: Flollow up from Admin Plenary, Brian E Carpenter, 15:50
- Flollow up from Admin Plenary, Kathleen Moriarty, 14:20
- Re: [saag] Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>), Benjamin Kaduk, 14:06
- Re: Good practices, Abdussalam Baryun, 13:45
- Re: Good practices, John C Klensin, 11:31
- Re: [saag] Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>), Stephen Kent, 11:11
- Re: [saag] Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>), Stephen Kent, 11:10
- Re: [saag] Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>), Dave Crocker, 10:52
- Re: [saag] Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>), Benjamin Kaduk, 10:46
- Re: [saag] Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>), Stephen Farrell, 10:40
- Re: [saag] Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>), Stephen Kent, 10:34
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-child-syncronization-02.txt> (Child To Parent Synchronization in DNS) to Proposed Standard, Wes Hardaker, 10:18
- Re: Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>), Eliot Lear, 08:11
- Re: [saag] Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>), Dave Crocker, 08:02
August 18, 2014
- Re: [saag] Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>), Benjamin Kaduk, 22:49
- Re: [saag] Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment, Benjamin Kaduk, 22:28
- Re: [saag] Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>), Benjamin Kaduk, 22:26
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Benjamin Kaduk, 18:30
- Re: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee, Nico Williams, 16:51
- Re: Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>), Stephen Farrell, 16:43
- Re: Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>), Dave Crocker, 16:40
- Re: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee, John C Klensin, 16:39
- Re: Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>), Stephen Farrell, 16:30
- Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment, Stephen Kent, 16:20
- Re: Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>), Stephen Kent, 16:19
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Stephen Kent, 16:18
- Re: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee, Samuel Weiler, 15:55
- Re: [saag] DANE should be more prominent (Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment), Viktor Dukhovni, 10:45
- Re: Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>), Nico Williams, 10:36
- RE: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-forces-model-extension-03, Haleplidis Evangelos, 10:09
- Re: [saag]: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment, John Wroclawski, 10:08
- Re: the ancient reorganisation question, was IETF-91 Question etc, Thomas Clausen, 10:05
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-child-syncronization-02.txt> (Child To Parent Synchronization in DNS) to Proposed Standard, 神明達哉, 10:04
- Re: [rmcat] Last Call: <draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements-05.txt> (Congestion Control Requirements For RMCAT) to Informational RFC, Colin Perkins, 09:49
August 17, 2014
- Re: [saag] DANE should be more prominent (Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment), Benjamin Kaduk, 23:21
- Re: Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>), Nico Williams, 12:30
- Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment, Paul Wouters, 10:10
- Re: Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>), Paul Wouters, 09:59
- Re: DANE should be more prominent (Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment), Paul Wouters, 09:45
- Re: [saag] DANE should be more prominent (Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment), Dave Crocker, 08:24
August 16, 2014
- Re: [saag] DANE should be more prominent (Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment), Benjamin Kaduk, 22:18
- Re: DANE should be more prominent (Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment), Phillip Hallam-Baker, 22:13
- RE: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment, l.wood, 20:06
- Re: [saag]: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment, Nico Williams, 16:52
- Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment, Nico Williams, 15:22
- DANE should be more prominent (Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment), Nico Williams, 15:20
- Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment, Nico Williams, 15:16
- Re: [saag] : Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment, Benjamin Kaduk, 15:08
- Re: Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>), Nico Williams, 15:07
- Re: [saag] Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>), Benjamin Kaduk, 15:04
- Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment, Michael Richardson, 14:45
- Re: [saag] : Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment, Theodore Ts'o, 08:13
- RE: [saag]: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment, l.wood, 00:02
August 15, 2014
- Re: [saag]: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment, Viktor Dukhovni, 23:49
- RE: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment, l.wood, 21:21
- Re: Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>), Dave Crocker, 20:14
- Re: Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>), Scott Kitterman, 20:00
- Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>), Dave Crocker, 19:26
- Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment, Stephen Farrell, 19:13
- Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment, Fred Baker (fred), 18:44
- Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment, Dave Crocker, 18:41
- Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment, Stephen Farrell, 18:30
- Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment, Dave Crocker, 18:21
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Viktor Dukhovni, 17:18
- Re: [saag]: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment, Eliot Lear, 16:38
- Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Stephen Kent, 16:36
- Re: [saag]: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment, Viktor Dukhovni, 16:20
- Re: [saag]: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment, Viktor Dukhovni, 16:15
- Re: [saag]: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment, Paul Wouters, 16:07
- Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment, Pete Resnick, 15:49
- Re: [saag]: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment, Viktor Dukhovni, 15:48
- Re: [saag] : Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment, Benjamin Kaduk, 15:35
- Re: [saag]: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment, Paul Wouters, 15:30
- Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment, Dave Crocker, 15:29
- Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment, Paul Wouters, 15:16
- Re: the ancient reorganisation question, was IETF-91 Question etc, Thomas Clausen, 14:52
- Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment, Dave Crocker, 14:42
- Re: [saag]: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment, Viktor Dukhovni, 14:11
- Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment, Paul Wouters, 14:02
- Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-08, Barry Leiba, 13:07
- Re: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee - Alternative hotel: D3, Warren Kumari, 12:39
- Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment, Viktor Dukhovni, 12:35
- Re: the ancient reorganisation question, was IETF-91 Question etc, Abdussalam Baryun, 11:06
- Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment, Dave Crocker, 10:57
- Re: the ancient reorganisation question, was IETF-91 Question etc, t.p., 08:42
- Re: the ancient reorganisation question, was IETF-91 Question etc, Lou Berger, 07:06
- Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Stephen Farrell, 06:51
- the ancient reorganisation question, was IETF-91 Question etc, t.p., 06:06
August 13, 2014
- Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Scott Brim, 11:22
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-child-syncronization-02.txt> (Child To Parent Synchronization in DNS) to Proposed Standard, manning, 10:49
- Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Theodore Ts'o, 09:01
- Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Eliot Lear, 07:57
- Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Ted Lemon, 07:37
- Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Loa Andersson, 07:32
- Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Ted Lemon, 07:26
- Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Loa Andersson, 07:22
- Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Ted Lemon, 07:12
- Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Alia Atlas, 04:12
- Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Eliot Lear, 01:09
- Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Tim Chown, 00:28
August 12, 2014
- Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, manning bill, 23:09
- Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Lou Berger, 22:58
- Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Nico Williams, 22:56
- Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, manning bill, 22:46
- Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, manning bill, 22:44
- Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Ted Lemon, 22:03
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-child-syncronization-02.txt> (Child To Parent Synchronization in DNS) to Proposed Standard, Olafur Gudmundsson, 21:24
- Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Nico Williams, 21:00
- Re: Last Call List was Re: Best tool to cut posts 6.25 inches square x 96 inches, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 20:41
- Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, manning bill, 20:41
- Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Loa Andersson, 18:48
- Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Brian E Carpenter, 18:31
- Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, John C Klensin, 18:30
- Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Tim Wicinski, 18:29
- Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Brian E Carpenter, 18:20
- Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Ted Lemon, 18:15
- Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Mark Andrews, 18:07
- Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, manning bill, 17:46
- Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Fred Baker (fred), 17:31
- Re: Best tool to cut posts 6.25 inches square x 96 inches, Warren Kumari, 17:31
- Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Ralph Droms, 17:28
- Re: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee, Nico Williams, 17:27
- Re: Best tool to cut posts 6.25 inches square x 96 inches, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 17:25
- Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Melinda Shore, 17:24
- Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Carsten Bormann, 17:23
- Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Ted Lemon, 17:20
- Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Melinda Shore, 17:11
- Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Yoav Nir, 17:09
- Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Nico Williams, 17:03
- Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, John Levine, 16:56
- Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-08, Black, David, 15:31
- Re: Last Call List was Re: Best tool to cut posts 6.25 inches square x 96 inches, Brian E Carpenter, 15:14
- Re: Genart LC review: draft-ietf-conex-abstract-mech-12, Robert Sparks, 12:30
- Re: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee, Nico Williams, 11:44
- Re: value of this list, Chris Elliott, 11:40
- Re: value of this list, Michael StJohns, 11:17
- Re: value of this list, Andrew Sullivan, 11:15
- Re: value of this list, Abdussalam Baryun, 11:10
- Re: Last Call List was Re: Best tool to cut posts 6.25 inches square x 96 inches, Nico Williams, 11:09
- Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-learmonth-hackerspace-header-00.txt, Iain R. Learmonth, 10:26
- Re: Last Call List was Re: Best tool to cut posts 6.25 inches square x 96 inches, Avri Doria, 10:22
- Re: Last Call List was Re: Best tool to cut posts 6.25 inches square x 96 inches, Warren Kumari, 09:32
- Re: value of this list, Kathleen Moriarty, 08:30
- RE: value of this list, Dearlove, Christopher (UK), 08:14
- value of this list, Eliot Lear, 07:53
- Re: Last Call List was Re: Best tool to cut posts 6.25 inches square x 96 inches, Dave Crocker, 07:35
- Re: Last Call List was Re: Best tool to cut posts 6.25 inches square x 96 inches, Stephen Farrell, 07:17
- RE: Last Call List was Re: Best tool to cut posts 6.25 inches square x 96 inches, l.wood, 07:11
- Last Call List was Re: Best tool to cut posts 6.25 inches square x 96 inches, Ray Pelletier, 05:11
- Re: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee, Yoav Nir, 02:49
- RE: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee, Christer Holmberg, 02:39
- Re: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee, Yoav Nir, 02:28
- Re: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee, Yoav Nir, 02:20
- Re: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee, Yoav Nir, 01:01
- Re: Best tool to cut posts 6.25 inches square x 96 inches, Nico Williams, 00:58
- Re: Best tool to cut posts 6.25 inches square x 96 inches, Melinda Shore, 00:22
- Re: Best tool to cut posts 6.25 inches square x 96 inches, Brian E Carpenter, 00:14
- Re: Best tool to cut posts 6.25 inches square x 96 inches, Ted Lemon, 00:13
- RE: Best tool to cut posts 6.25 inches square x 96 inches, Christian Huitema, 00:08
August 11, 2014
- Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-learmonth-hackerspace-header-00.txt, ned+ietf, 23:54
- Re: Best tool to cut posts 6.25 inches square x 96 inches, Chris Elliott, 23:40
- Re: Best tool to cut posts 6.25 inches square x 96 inches, Fred Baker (fred), 23:32
- Re: Best tool to cut posts 6.25 inches square x 96 inches, Michael StJohns, 22:51
- Re: Best tool to cut posts 6.25 inches square x 96 inches, Melinda Shore, 22:09
- Re: Best tool to cut posts 6.25 inches square x 96 inches, Chris Elliott, 22:06
- Re: Best tool to cut posts 6.25 inches square x 96 inches, Chris Elliott, 22:02
- Re: Best tool to cut posts 6.25 inches square x 96 inches, Melinda Shore, 21:47
- Best tool to cut posts 6.25 inches square x 96 inches, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 21:43
- Re: In fairness to the IAOC [was:... construction and resort fee], Dave Crocker, 17:46
- In fairness to the IAOC [was:... construction and resort fee], Brian E Carpenter, 17:39
- RE: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee, Adrian Farrel, 17:00
- Re: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee, Ted Lemon, 16:56
- Re: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee, Dave Crocker, 16:53
- Re: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee, Lou Berger, 16:36
- Re: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee, Behcet Sarikaya, 16:28
- Re: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee, Dave Crocker, 16:21
- RE: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee - Alternative hotel: D3, Christer Holmberg, 13:11
- Re: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee, Chris Elliott, 11:52
- Re: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee, Mary Barnes, 11:25
- Re: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee, Stephen Farrell, 11:22
- Re: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee, Lou Berger, 11:20
- Re: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee, Chris Elliott, 11:15
- Re: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee, Cullen Jennings, 10:55
- Re: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee, Mary Barnes, 10:50
- Re: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee, Warren Kumari, 10:43
- Re: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee, Mary Barnes, 10:41
- Re: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee, Simon Perreault, 10:36
- RE: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee, Rauschenbach, Uwe (NSN - DE/Munich), 10:31
- Re: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee, Christopher Morrow, 10:26
- Fwd: I-D Action: draft-learmonth-hackerspace-header-00.txt, Stewart Bryant (stbryant), 10:10
- Re: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee, Rosen, Brian, 10:07
- Re: [saag] What does DNSSec protect? (Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC), manning, 10:06
- Re: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee, Mary Barnes, 09:45
- Re: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee, Dave Crocker, 09:14
- Re: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee, Ray Pelletier, 08:49
- Re: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee, Thomas D. Nadeau, 08:09
- Re: [saag] What does DNSSec protect? (Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC), João Damas, 05:51
- RE: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee, Christer Holmberg, 03:12
- Re: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee, Eliot Lear, 02:46
- Re: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee, Bert Wijnen (IETF), 02:40
- Re: [saag] What does DNSSec protect? (Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC), Nico Williams, 01:20
- Re: [saag] What does DNSSec protect? (Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC), Nico Williams, 01:16
August 10, 2014
- Re: Good practices, Melinda Shore, 22:38
- Re: [saag] What does DNSSec protect? (Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC), Mark Andrews, 21:59
- RE: Good practices (was: Gen-art LC review: draft-secretaries-good-practices-06), John C Klensin, 21:31
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-child-syncronization-02.txt> (Child To Parent Synchronization in DNS) to Proposed Standard, George Michaelson, 20:10
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-child-syncronization-02.txt> (Child To Parent Synchronization in DNS) to Proposed Standard, Randy Bush, 19:50
- RE: Good practices (was: Gen-art LC review: draft-secretaries-good-practices-06), S Moonesamy, 17:54
- Re: [saag] What does DNSSec protect? (Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC), Andrew Sullivan, 17:37
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-netmod-snmp-cfg-06, Roni Even, 16:42
- Re: Good practices, John Leslie, 15:28
- Re: [saag] What does DNSSec protect? (Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC), Henry B Hotz, 15:24
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-child-syncronization-02.txt> (Child To Parent Synchronization in DNS) to Proposed Standard, joel jaeggli, 15:10
- Re: Good practices, Brian E Carpenter, 14:52
- Re: [saag] What does DNSSec protect? (Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC), John C Klensin, 14:47
- Re: [saag] What does DNSSec protect? (Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC), John C Klensin, 14:37
- Re: [saag] What does DNSSec protect? (Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC), Brian E Carpenter, 14:36
- Re: [saag] What does DNSSec protect? (Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC), Andrew Sullivan, 13:18
- Re: [saag] What does DNSSec protect? (Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC), John Levine, 12:35
- Re: [saag] What does DNSSec protect? (Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC), John C Klensin, 09:37
- Re: Good practices (was: Gen-art LC review: draft-secretaries-good-practices-06), John Leslie, 06:18
- Re: Good practices (was: Gen-art LC review: draft-secretaries-good-practices-06), Abdussalam Baryun, 06:00
- RE: Good practices (was: Gen-art LC review: draft-secretaries-good-practices-06), Adrian Farrel, 05:26
- Good practices (was: Gen-art LC review: draft-secretaries-good-practices-06), S Moonesamy, 04:58
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-netmod-snmp-cfg-06, Roni Even, 04:10
August 09, 2014
- Re: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee, Michael Richardson, 22:21
- Re: [saag] What does DNSSec protect? (Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC), Donald Eastlake, 16:35
- Re: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee, John C Klensin, 13:06
- Re: IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee, Ray Pelletier, 12:42
- Re: What does DNSSec protect? (Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC), Paul Wouters, 12:04
- Re: [saag] What does DNSSec protect? (Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC), Steve Crocker, 11:32
- IETF-91 Question - Hilton Hawaiian village construction and resort fee, Mary Barnes, 11:29
- What does DNSSec protect? (Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC), Dave Crocker, 11:28
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-child-syncronization-02.txt> (Child To Parent Synchronization in DNS) to Proposed Standard, Patrik Fältström, 02:08
August 08, 2014
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-07.txt> (WebRTC Data Channel Establishment Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Richard Barnes, 16:58
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-11.txt> (WebRTC Data Channels) to Proposed Standard, Richard Barnes, 16:57
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-child-syncronization-02.txt> (Child To Parent Synchronization in DNS) to Proposed Standard, Warren Kumari, 13:06
- Re: Genart LC review: draft-ietf-conex-abstract-mech-12, Bob Briscoe, 10:32
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Nico Williams, 10:31
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Paul Wouters, 10:31
- Re: [saag] : DNSSEC PKI semantics and risks (was tangentially: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>), Paul Wouters, 10:30
- Re: Target audience? (was Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC), Stephen Farrell, 10:04
- Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Stephen Farrell, 09:36
- Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Stephen Farrell, 09:33
- Re: [saag] : DNSSEC PKI semantics and risks (was tangentially: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>), Phillip Hallam-Baker, 07:04
August 07, 2014
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-forces-model-extension-03, Ben Campbell, 17:51
- Appointment to 2015 ICANN Nominating Committee, IAB Chair, 14:23
- Re: [conex] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-conex-abstract-mech-12, John Leslie, 13:20
- Re: [saag] : DNSSEC PKI semantics and risks (was tangentially: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>), Phillip Hallam-Baker, 12:58
- Re: [conex] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-conex-abstract-mech-12, Matt Mathis, 12:13
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Nico Williams, 11:45
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Nico Williams, 11:44
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Nico Williams, 11:44
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Viktor Dukhovni, 11:21
- Re: [saag] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Rene Struik, 11:04
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-netext-wifi-epc-eap-attributes-08, Koodli, Rajeev, 11:03
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Paul Wouters, 11:02
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Paul Wouters, 11:01
- Re: [saag] : DNSSEC PKI semantics and risks (was tangentially: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>), Nico Williams, 10:59
- Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Nico Williams, 10:59
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Nico Williams, 10:58
- RE: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call Review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-06, Lucy yong, 10:56
- Re: [conex] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-conex-abstract-mech-12, Bob Briscoe, 10:55
- Re: Genart LC review: draft-ietf-conex-abstract-mech-12, Bob Briscoe, 10:55
- Re: [conex] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-conex-abstract-mech-12, John Leslie, 10:06
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Viktor Dukhovni, 10:04
- Re: [conex] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-conex-abstract-mech-12, John Leslie, 07:01
- Re: [saag] : DNSSEC PKI semantics and risks (was tangentially: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>), Tony Finch, 05:56
- Re: Individual submission, Abdussalam Baryun, 04:27
August 06, 2014
- Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-netext-wifi-epc-eap-attributes-09, Peter Yee, 22:25
- Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-appsawg-email-auth-codes-05, Peter Yee, 21:21
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-6man-multicast-addr-arch-update-05, Jari Arkko, 21:10
- Genart LC review draft-ietf-paws-protocol-14 (was Re: Second Last Call: <draft-ietf-paws-protocol-14.txt> (Protocol to Access White-Space (PAWS) Databases) to Proposed Standard), Robert Sparks, 20:55
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Viktor Dukhovni, 20:34
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Mark Andrews, 20:04
- Re: Genart LC review: draft-ietf-conex-abstract-mech-12, Matt Mathis, 19:03
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-netext-wifi-epc-eap-attributes-08, Jari Arkko, 18:06
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call Review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-06, Jari Arkko, 18:01
- [saag]: DNSSEC PKI semantics and risks (was tangentially: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>), Viktor Dukhovni, 17:55
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, John C Klensin, 17:40
- Re: Individual submission, Dave Crocker, 17:02
- Individual submission (was: Best Effort Key Management), S Moonesamy, 15:10
- Re: [saag] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Stephen Farrell, 14:38
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Viktor Dukhovni, 12:56
- Re: Best Effort Key Management (was Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>, Scott Kitterman, 12:53
- Re: [saag] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Viktor Dukhovni, 11:37
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Nico Williams, 10:53
- Re: Best Effort Key Management (was Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>, Paul Wouters, 10:53
- RE: Gen-ART Last Call Review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-06, Lucy yong, 10:52
- Re: [saag] Best Effort Key Management (was Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>, Viktor Dukhovni, 10:45
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Stephen Kent, 10:42
- Re: Best Effort Key Management (was Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>, Stephen Farrell, 10:32
- Re: Best Effort Key Management (was Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>, Dave Crocker, 09:52
- Re: Best Effort Key Management (was Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>, Viktor Dukhovni, 09:31
- Re: Best Effort Key Management (was Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>, Dave Crocker, 09:19
- Re: Best Effort Key Management (was Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>, Stephen Farrell, 09:02
- Re: Best Effort Key Management (was Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>, Stephen Farrell, 09:01
- Best Effort Key Management (was Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>, Dave Crocker, 08:46
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Stephen Farrell, 07:25
- Wikipedia, was Target audience? (was Last Call Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time to Informational RFC), Alessandro Vesely, 04:10
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Patrik Fältström, 00:16
August 05, 2014
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Viktor Dukhovni, 23:29
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Scott Kitterman, 22:53
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Viktor Dukhovni, 22:41
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Dave Crocker, 22:30
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Viktor Dukhovni, 22:22
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Viktor Dukhovni, 22:17
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Scott Kitterman, 22:14
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Dave Crocker, 22:01
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Viktor Dukhovni, 21:56
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Dave Crocker, 21:28
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Viktor Dukhovni, 20:27
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Dave Crocker, 20:07
- Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-07, Ben Campbell, 15:58
- Re: Gen-ART Last Call Review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-06, Ben Campbell, 15:46
- Genart LC review: draft-ietf-conex-abstract-mech-12, Robert Sparks, 14:59
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Viktor Dukhovni, 13:13
- Re: Internet 2020 Goals, Joe Touch, 11:28
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Stephen Kent, 10:43
August 04, 2014
- Re: Internet 2020 Goals, Pranesh Prakash, 14:15
- Re: Target audience? (was Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC), Scott Kitterman, 13:12
- Re: Target audience? (was Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC), Viktor Dukhovni, 12:58
- Re: Target audience? (was Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC), Viktor Dukhovni, 12:53
- Target audience? (was Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC), Dave Crocker, 12:11
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Stephen Kent, 11:52
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Stephen Kent, 11:49
- Re: [Roll] Pictures, Slides and Results for LLN PlugFest IETF 90, Roscoe, Alexander, 10:08
August 01, 2014
- Pictures, Slides and Results for LLN PlugFest IETF 90, Ines Robles, 15:37
- Re: OpenSource vs. IETF Standards, Martin Rex, 15:35
- Re: OpenSource vs. IETF Standards, Martin Rex, 15:03
- Re: OpenSource vs. IETF Standards, Martin Rex, 14:50
- Re: OpenSource vs. IETF Standards, Leif Johansson, 14:32
- Re: OpenSource vs. IETF Standards, Jim Gettys, 13:09
- Re: OpenSource vs. IETF Standards, Doug Barton, 11:02
- Re: OpenSource vs. IETF Standards, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 09:20
- Re: Security for the IETF wireless network, Michael Richardson, 08:01
- Blog: YANG Takes Off in the Industry, Benoit Claise, 06:18
- Re: OpenSource vs. IETF Standards, Patrik Fältström, 04:17
- Re: OpenSource vs. IETF Standards, Alessandro Vesely, 03:22
- Re: Hotel networks (Was Re: Security for the IETF wireless network), Melinda Shore, 00:36
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-appsawg-email-auth-codes-04, Peter Yee, 00:32