Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question

On 08/12/2014 10:05 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:

Indeed, I would say that of the problems I'm aware of, tourists barely 
register.


I agree, but one of the objectives stated by the routing ADs for their
planned routing area reorg is reducing the number of tourists in a WG.
BTW this is their issue, not mine so they will have to explain.

Lou

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, (continued) Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Nico Williams Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Ralph Droms Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Fred Baker (fred) Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, manning bill Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Brian E Carpenter Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, manning bill Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Nico Williams Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, manning bill Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Nico Williams Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Ted Lemon Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Lou Berger <= Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Alia Atlas the ancient reorganisation question, was IETF-91 Question etc, t.p. Re: the ancient reorganisation question, was IETF-91 Question etc, Lou Berger Re: the ancient reorganisation question, was IETF-91 Question etc, t.p. Re: the ancient reorganisation question, was IETF-91 Question etc, Abdussalam Baryun Re: the ancient reorganisation question, was IETF-91 Question etc, Thomas Clausen Re: the ancient reorganisation question, was IETF-91 Question etc, Thomas Clausen Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, manning bill Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Ted Lemon Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Loa Andersson