Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question

On Aug 13, 2014, at 8:32 AM, Loa Andersson <loa(_at_)pi(_dot_)nu> wrote:

Yes - I agree I was jsut bantering!


Me too, but we should probably stop, lest we be yelled at for wasting time on 
the list... :)

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, (continued) Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, manning bill Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Nico Williams Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Ted Lemon Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Lou Berger Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Alia Atlas Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, manning bill Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Ted Lemon Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Loa Andersson Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Ted Lemon Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Loa Andersson Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Ted Lemon <= Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Eliot Lear Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Scott Brim Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Theodore Ts'o Message not available Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, manning bill Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Eliot Lear Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Yoav Nir Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Ted Lemon Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Melinda Shore Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Ted Lemon Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question, Tim Wicinski