On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Brian E Carpenter <
brian(_dot_)e(_dot_)carpenter(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
I'd rather see a rapid IETF Last Call on draft-kucherawy-rfc3777bis-01,
which is intentionally a no-op in terms of process changes. It could
easily be expedited as an RFC before the next IETF, if anybody cares
that much. Then we can have a managed discussion of the issues and
proposals that Mike has raised, which deserve debate.
For what it's worth, the RFC Editor turnaround has been around a month
lately, at least for documents going through working groups for which I'm
co-chair. Unless there are strings pulled, a four-week last call, a
telechat cycle, and a month in the editor queue won't fit between now and
Honolulu.
But I also expect it would be a very lightweight Last Call, and would make
follow-on evolution of the BCP easier.
-MSK