Adrian Farrel
AB
2- The draft mentions in the introduction:- This modification is
strictly optional,
[AB] the reviewer suggests to include in the ID-Abstract that this
standard is optional. It is not enough to only mention in the
introduction such important information.
Good point.
The abstract does actually say "to permit", which indicates this is not
mandatory. But we can add the word optional to that.
Regarding the title, there's a usual tradeoff between brevity (and it's already
not brief) and detail. I wouldn't add the suggests "based on link quality" as
that really adds nothing useful (it's not an optimisation based on link
quality, it's an optimisation to remove a side-effect of the use of link
quality). To be a useful lengthening of the title, it would, I think, have to
mention something about the two hop neighbourhood. I haven't consulted with my
co-author, but my proposal would be to see if anyone on the IESG has a problem
with the title as-is.
--
Christopher Dearlove
Senior Principal Engineer, Information Assurance Group
Communications, Networks and Image Analysis Capability
BAE Systems Advanced Technology Centre
West Hanningfield Road, Great Baddow, Chelmsford, CM2 8HN, UK
Tel: +44 1245 242194 | Fax: +44 1245 242124
chris(_dot_)dearlove(_at_)baesystems(_dot_)com | http://www.baesystems.com
BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
Registered Office: Warwick House, PO Box 87, Farnborough Aerospace Centre,
Farnborough, Hants, GU14 6YU, UK
Registered in England & Wales No: 1996687
********************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
distribute its contents to any other person.
********************************************************************