Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-

PS: If Barry or anyone else wants to do this instead that's
fine by me.


I already have; the status-change document is in Last Call Requested state.

Barry

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09), (continued) Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09), John C Klensin Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09), Stephen Farrell Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09), l.wood Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09), John C Klensin Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09), l.wood Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09), Dave Cridland Integrity protection for RFCs (was Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of) draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09), Nico Williams Re: Integrity protection for RFCs (was Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of) draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09), manning bill Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09), Phillip Hallam-Baker Re: Status of RFC 20, Carsten Bormann Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09), Barry Leiba <= Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09), Julian Reschke Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09), ned+ietf Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09), John C Klensin Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09), ned+ietf Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09), John C Klensin Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09), John C Klensin Re: Status of RFC 20, Brian E Carpenter Re: Status of RFC 20, joel jaeggli Re: Status of RFC 20, John C Klensin Re: Status of RFC 20, joel jaeggli

Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)