Re: Status of RFC 20

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill(_at_)hallambaker(_dot_)com> writes:

it would
be more appropriate to reformat RFC20 in the new presentation format.


Done:-)

https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/pdfrfc/rfc20.txt.pdf

Grüße, Carsten

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09), (continued) Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09), Stephen Farrell Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09), John C Klensin Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09), Stephen Farrell Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09), l.wood Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09), John C Klensin Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09), l.wood Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09), Dave Cridland Integrity protection for RFCs (was Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of) draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09), Nico Williams Re: Integrity protection for RFCs (was Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of) draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09), manning bill Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09), Phillip Hallam-Baker Re: Status of RFC 20, Carsten Bormann <= Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09), Barry Leiba Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09), Julian Reschke Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09), ned+ietf Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09), John C Klensin Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09), ned+ietf Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09), John C Klensin Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09), John C Klensin Re: Status of RFC 20, Brian E Carpenter Re: Status of RFC 20, joel jaeggli Re: Status of RFC 20, John C Klensin