Ray,
Please read my response to Stephen. I didn't at all suggest what he seems
to have interpreted me
to have done.
Regards,
Mary.
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Ray Pelletier <rpelletier(_at_)isoc(_dot_)org>
wrote:
+1
Ray
On Feb 14, 2015, at 4:15 PM, Stephen Farrell
<stephen(_dot_)farrell(_at_)cs(_dot_)tcd(_dot_)ie>
wrote:
On 14/02/15 18:21, Mary Barnes wrote:
And, actually this is already happening with Meetecho.
I think we ought forget about charging for remote attendance until
remote attendance is much better. Remotely attending IETF-91 via
meetecho was a good bit better than I expected but is nowhere near
the point where we could charge. Let's make it work first, and then
see how that affects attendance and then figure out charging models
and not try do that backwards by starting to discuss charging models
for something that doesn't yet exist.
S.