On May 30, 2015, at 01:48, Eliot Lear <lear(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com> wrote:
I like this draft, but I suggest that it apply to ALL RFCs (not just the
IETF stream).
Eliot
Sorry but I disagree. Not ALL RFCs, to exemplify why, I think the use of a
humorous nom de plume or a sarcastic acknowledgement would be perfectly
legitimate for RFCs published on a particular day in the spring.
Authorship, contribution, and acknowledgement are serious and important issues,
but that is no reason to completely abandon or exclude humor and sarcasm in
appropriate doses.
--
===============================================
David Farmer Email: farmer(_at_)umn(_dot_)edu
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE Phone: +1-612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: +1-612-812-9952
===============================================