On Jun 2, 2015, at 12:59 PM, Joe Touch <touch(_at_)isi(_dot_)edu> wrote:
Leaving out the have-nots - or those whose access is blocked by others
when content cannot be scanned - isn't moving forward.
That would certainly be a problem if the consensus were not to provide both a
secure and an, as you call it, "open" version of all IETF documents.