Re: Fwd: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP

Hiya,

On 11/08/15 17:56, Michael Richardson wrote:
> I would propose that the new BCP be the set of 1984 and RFC2804 (which is
> also informational).
> I also think that this would be proceedurally make more sense.
I did ponder that a bit but my own conclusion fwiw was that the
topics are sufficiently different that keeping them separate could
be better and would be simpler. And if we wanted 2804 as a BCP that
could be done after we see what folks think of this status-change. I
do agree that it'd be sensible to consider following the same path
with both of these at some point, though I'd say it's maybe simpler
to take 'em one at a time.

S.

> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF(_at_)sandelman(_dot_)ca>, Sandelman Software 
> Works
>  -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature