I disagree with this as an absolute statement
there are times, not all that often but actual cases, where a technical RFC has
been progressed
on the standards track without creating a new RFC
it does take developing information about implementations etc, bit that info
does not go into a RFC
Scott
On Aug 11, 2015, at 5:06 PM, Joe Touch <touch(_at_)isi(_dot_)edu> wrote:
On 8/11/2015 2:03 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
There is no end-run. The IESG might conclude from the discussion that there
is no rough consensus to reclassify the RFC.
IMO, reclassifying an existing RFC that isn't to "Historic" is an end-run.
Joe