On 8/11/15 13:11 , Joe Touch wrote:
I disagree with this change of status. Documents that refer to this RFC
informationally would all need to be considered for potential impact.
Initially I thought this was a fair point, so I decided to look at the
references to RFC1984;
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc1984/referencedby/
There are three current RFCs that reference RFC 1984, in my opinion none
of the uses are incompatible with RFC 1984 being promoted to BCP.
I support RFC 1984 being promoted to BCP.
--
================================================
David Farmer Email: farmer(_at_)umn(_dot_)edu
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE Phone: 1-612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 1-612-812-9952
================================================