ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: IESG Area Structure and Last night's missing question

2015-11-07 06:45:15
On 11/07/2015 07:35 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
Without pointing fingers at you, Keith, I want to observe that I've heard your 
comment from a number of

RFC quality (at least for the topics I care about) seems to have
dropped considerably.
If you care about the topics and you care about the quality of the RFCs, there 
is something (that I think is) obvious you can do about it: participate in the 
development and review of the documents.

Of course, everyone is really busy, but someone has to do the work.

I am indeed participating in development and review of several documents, though like many others, I have less time to invest in IETF than I once did. (and there seems to be less return on that investment than in the past)

One thing that seems to have changed in the last 20 years or so - the IETF is producing more documents, on a much wider variety of topics, with the number of active participants about the same or fewer (at least if one uses the number of people who attend meetings as an indicator for the number of active participants). Sadly, this increased number of documents is treated as a sign of progress.

Keith

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>