Re: Checksum at IP layer - is it even needed ?

On 14 December 2015 at 23:45, Christopher Morrow
<morrowc(_dot_)lists(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:

isn't the solution to all of this to just use TLS ? (or DTLS for udp)


Sort of. Or proper L4 like QUIC, MinimaLT. You'll know packet got
mangled, but troubleshooting which device it was is going to be hell.

-- 
  ++ytti

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Checksum at IP layer - is it even needed ?, (continued) Re: Checksum at IP layer - is it even needed ?, Christopher Morrow Re: Checksum at IP layer - is it even needed ?, Alexey Eromenko Re: Checksum at IP layer - is it even needed ?, Christopher Morrow Re: Checksum at IP layer - is it even needed ?, Stewart Bryant Re: Checksum at IP layer - is it even needed ?, lloyd.wood Re: Checksum at IP layer - is it even needed ?, Stewart Bryant Re: Checksum at IP layer - is it even needed ?, Alexey Eromenko Re: Checksum at IP layer - is it even needed ?, lloyd.wood Re: Checksum at IP layer - is it even needed ?, Alexey Eromenko Re: Checksum at IP layer - is it even needed ?, lloyd.wood Re: Checksum at IP layer - is it even needed ?, Saku Ytti <= Re: Checksum at IP layer - is it even needed ?, Christopher Morrow Re: Checksum at IP layer - is it even needed ?, Saku Ytti Re: Checksum at IP layer - is it even needed ?, Jared Mauch Re: Checksum at IP layer - is it even needed ?, Masataka Ohta Re: Checksum at IP layer - is it even needed ?, Jared Mauch Re: Checksum at IP layer - is it even needed ?, Mark Andrews Re: Checksum at IP layer - is it even needed ?, Phillip Hallam-Baker Re: Checksum at IP layer - is it even needed ?, Masataka Ohta Re: Checksum at IP layer - is it even needed ?, Saku Ytti Re: Checksum at IP layer - is it even needed ?, Patrik Fältström