Re: [Recentattendees] Remote Participation for IETF 95: Meetecho Details

On 01/04/16 17:12, Jari Arkko wrote:
> Overall IAOC transparency question is worth another thread, I think.
I reckon I do agree with you and John on that. It's pretty
easy for well intended folks to end up not being transparent
and well worth spending a bit of time/effort on seeing if
we can match current expectations met elsewhere whilst also
being efficient with all the myriad of IAOC stuff that is being
done well.

S.

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature