IETF Discussion (thread)
Interim step on meetings site feedback — for sites currently under active consideration,
The IAOC,
2016/04/18
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback â?? for sites currently under active consideration, Dan Harkins, 2016/04/18
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Melinda Shore, 2016/04/18
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Dan Harkins, 2016/04/18
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, John Levine, 2016/04/18
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, nalini.elkins, 2016/04/18
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Corinne Cath, 2016/04/19
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Ted Lemon, 2016/04/19
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Abdussalam Baryun, 2016/04/20
- Message not available
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration (off-topic), S Moonesamy, 2016/04/22
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration (off-topic), Corinne Cath, 2016/04/22
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Christian O'Flaherty, 2016/04/19
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Ted Lemon, 2016/04/19
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, nalini.elkins, 2016/04/19
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Melinda Shore, 2016/04/19
- f2f and mailing list participation - a question for "newer" participants (Was: Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration), Stephen Farrell, 2016/04/19
- Re: f2f and mailing list participation - a question for "newer" participants (Was: Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration), Joseph Lorenzo Hall, 2016/04/19
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Vinayak Hegde, 2016/04/19
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Ted Lemon, 2016/04/19
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Harald Alvestrand, 2016/04/20
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, thomas nadeau, 2016/04/20
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Adam Roach, 2016/04/20
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, John Levine, 2016/04/20
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Melinda Shore, 2016/04/20
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Abdussalam Baryun, 2016/04/20
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Stephan Wenger, 2016/04/20
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Christian O'Flaherty, 2016/04/19
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2016/04/21
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Ted Lemon, 2016/04/21
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Adam Roach, 2016/04/21
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Yoav Nir, 2016/04/21
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2016/04/21
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Ross Finlayson, 2016/04/21
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2016/04/21
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, lloyd.wood, 2016/04/22
- RE: Interim step on meetings site feedback — for sites currently under active consideration, Andrew Allen, 2016/04/18
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback — for sites currently under active consideration, Jari Arkko, 2016/04/19
- RE: [Recentattendees] Interim step on meetings site feedback — for sites currently under active consideration, fred.clark, 2016/04/18
spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message (fwd),
paul,
2016/04/15
- Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message (fwd), Dick Franks, 2016/04/15
- Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 2016/04/15
- Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message, John Leslie, 2016/04/15
- Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message, David Morris, 2016/04/15
- Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message, ietf, 2016/04/15
- Re: [89attendees] spam on old lists - was Fw: new important message, Carlos M. Martinez, 2016/04/15
- Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message, Benson Schliesser, 2016/04/15
- Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message, John R Levine, 2016/04/15
- Re: [89attendees] spam on old lists - was Fw: new important message, Dick Franks, 2016/04/15
- Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 2016/04/15
- Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message, John Leslie, 2016/04/15
- Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 2016/04/15
- Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees], Jared Mauch, 2016/04/15
Time to kill layer 2,
Phillip Hallam-Baker,
2016/04/14
- Re: Time to kill layer 2, Michael Richardson, 2016/04/14
- Re: Time to kill layer 2, chopps, 2016/04/14
- Re: Time to kill layer 2, Ted Lemon, 2016/04/14
- Re: Time to kill layer 2, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2016/04/14
- Re: Time to kill layer 2, Christopher Morrow, 2016/04/14
- Re: Time to kill layer 2, Ted Lemon, 2016/04/14
- Re: Time to kill layer 2, Brian E Carpenter, 2016/04/14
- Re: Time to kill layer 2, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2016/04/14
- Re: Time to kill layer 2, Charlie Perkins, 2016/04/14
- Re: Time to kill layer 2, Dimitri Staessens, 2016/04/14
- Re: Time to kill layer 2, Time Warner Cable, 2016/04/15
Transparency of IAOC,
SM,
2016/04/12
- Re: Transparency of IAOC, SM, 2016/04/12
- Re: Transparency of IAOC, Brian E Carpenter, 2016/04/12
- Re: Transparency of IAOC, Ted Lemon, 2016/04/12
- Re: Transparency of IAOC, Spencer Dawkins at IETF, 2016/04/12
- Re: Transparency of IAOC, Stephen Farrell, 2016/04/12
- Re: Transparency of IAOC, Scott O. Bradner, 2016/04/12
- Re: Transparency of IAOC, Stephen Farrell, 2016/04/12
- Re: Transparency of IAOC, Randy Bush, 2016/04/12
- Re: Transparency of IAOC, SM, 2016/04/13
- Re: Transparency of IAOC, Ted Lemon, 2016/04/12
thank you,
Randy Bush,
2016/04/11
- Re: thank you, Greg Shepherd, 2016/04/11
- Re: thank you, Richard Shockey, 2016/04/11
- Re: thank you, Fernando Gont, 2016/04/11
- Re: thank you, Leif Johansson, 2016/04/12
- Re: thank you, Carlos M. Martinez, 2016/04/12
Re: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-nomcom-procexp-00.txt,
Brian E Carpenter,
2016/04/08
- Re: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-nomcom-procexp-00.txt, Yoav Nir, 2016/04/09
- Re: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-nomcom-procexp-00.txt, Michael Richardson, 2016/04/09
- Re: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-nomcom-procexp-00.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy, 2016/04/09
- Re: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-nomcom-procexp-00.txt, Brian E Carpenter, 2016/04/09
- Re: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-nomcom-procexp-00.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy, 2016/04/09
- Re: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-nomcom-procexp-00.txt, John C Klensin, 2016/04/10
- Re: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-nomcom-procexp-00.txt, John C Klensin, 2016/04/10
- Re: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-nomcom-procexp-00.txt, Brian E Carpenter, 2016/04/10
- Re: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-nomcom-procexp-00.txt, Michael Richardson, 2016/04/11
Qualifying for NomCom,
Murray S. Kucherawy,
2016/04/07
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Ted Lemon, 2016/04/07
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Murray S. Kucherawy, 2016/04/07
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Ted Lemon, 2016/04/07
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Murray S. Kucherawy, 2016/04/07
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Michael Richardson, 2016/04/07
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Brian E Carpenter, 2016/04/07
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Murray S. Kucherawy, 2016/04/07
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Harald Alvestrand, 2016/04/07
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Murray S. Kucherawy, 2016/04/07
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, HANSEN, TONY L, 2016/04/07
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Murray S. Kucherawy, 2016/04/07
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, HANSEN, TONY L, 2016/04/07
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Murray S. Kucherawy, 2016/04/07
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, HANSEN, TONY L, 2016/04/08
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Yoav Nir, 2016/04/08
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Murray S. Kucherawy, 2016/04/08
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Michael Richardson, 2016/04/08
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Ted Lemon, 2016/04/08
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Murray S. Kucherawy, 2016/04/08
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Lucy Lynch, 2016/04/08
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Michael Richardson, 2016/04/08
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Harald Alvestrand, 2016/04/07
Concerns about Singapore,
Jari Arkko,
2016/04/07
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Adam Roach, 2016/04/07
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Jeffrey Haas, 2016/04/07
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Dhruv Dhody, 2016/04/07
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Leif Johansson, 2016/04/07
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Dhruv Dhody, 2016/04/07
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Leif Johansson, 2016/04/07
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Mikael Abrahamsson, 2016/04/07
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ladislav Lhotka, 2016/04/07
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Christian Hopps, 2016/04/07
- China, Ole Jacobsen, 2016/04/08
- Re: China, Jeffrey Haas, 2016/04/08
- Re: China, Ted Lemon, 2016/04/08
- Re: China, Ole Jacobsen, 2016/04/08
- Re: China, Melinda Shore, 2016/04/08
- Re: China, Ole Jacobsen, 2016/04/08
- Re: China, Melinda Shore, 2016/04/08
- Re: China, Michael Richardson, 2016/04/08
- Re: China, Scott Bradner, 2016/04/08
- Message not available
- Re: China, Tim Chown, 2016/04/08
- Re: China, Ray Pelletier, 2016/04/08
- Re: China, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 2016/04/09
- Re: China, Ray Pelletier, 2016/04/09
- Re: China, Stewart Bryant, 2016/04/09
- Re: China, Ole Jacobsen, 2016/04/09
- Re: China, Mary Barnes, 2016/04/08
- Re: China, HANSEN, TONY L, 2016/04/08
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Michael Richardson, 2016/04/08
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Randy Bush, 2016/04/09
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Michael StJohns, 2016/04/09
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Randy Bush, 2016/04/09
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Leif Johansson, 2016/04/10
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, chopps, 2016/04/10
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Randy Bush, 2016/04/10
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Michael StJohns, 2016/04/10
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ole Jacobsen, 2016/04/10
- Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places, John Levine, 2016/04/10
- Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2016/04/12
- Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places, Ted Lemon, 2016/04/12
- Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2016/04/12
- Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places, John R Levine, 2016/04/12
- Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places, Tony Finch, 2016/04/13
- Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places, tom p., 2016/04/13
- UK blacklist (Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places), Harald Alvestrand, 2016/04/12
- Re: UK blacklist (Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places), Christopher Morrow, 2016/04/12
- Message not available
- Re: UK blacklist (Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places), Tim Chown, 2016/04/13
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Randy Bush, 2016/04/10
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Michael StJohns, 2016/04/10
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Jared Mauch, 2016/04/10
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Robert Withers, 2016/04/10
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, John C Klensin, 2016/04/11
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Brian E Carpenter, 2016/04/10
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Dave Crocker, 2016/04/10
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Michael StJohns, 2016/04/10
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, chopps, 2016/04/10
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Vinayak Hegde, 2016/04/10
- RE: Concerns about Singapore, Andrew Allen, 2016/04/11
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Hutton, Andrew, 2016/04/11
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Yoav Nir, 2016/04/11
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ted Lemon, 2016/04/11
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Stephen Farrell, 2016/04/11
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, John C Klensin, 2016/04/11
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Stewart Bryant, 2016/04/11
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Joel M. Halpern, 2016/04/11
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Dave Crocker, 2016/04/11
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Richard Shockey, 2016/04/11
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Jared Mauch, 2016/04/11
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Stewart Bryant, 2016/04/12
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ted Lemon, 2016/04/12
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Rich Kulawiec, 2016/04/11
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Yoav Nir, 2016/04/11
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ted Lemon, 2016/04/11
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Yoav Nir, 2016/04/11
- Virtual Meetings, John Leslie, 2016/04/11
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Rich Kulawiec, 2016/04/11
- 1000 person virtual meeting (Was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), Stephen Farrell, 2016/04/11
- Re: 1000 person virtual meeting (Was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), David Farmer, 2016/04/11
- Re: 1000 person virtual meeting (Was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), Ted Lemon, 2016/04/11
- Re: 1000 person virtual meeting (Was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), Mark Andrews, 2016/04/11
- Re: 1000 person virtual meeting (Was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), Miles Fidelman, 2016/04/11
- Re: 1000 person virtual meeting (Was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), Stephen Farrell, 2016/04/11
- Re: 1000 person virtual meeting (Was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), Stephen Farrell, 2016/04/11
- Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], chopps, 2016/04/11
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Rich Kulawiec, 2016/04/12
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], chopps, 2016/04/12
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Rich Kulawiec, 2016/04/12
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], chopps, 2016/04/12
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Mary Barnes, 2016/04/12
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Christian Hopps, 2016/04/12
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Melinda Shore, 2016/04/12
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], chopps, 2016/04/12
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Melinda Shore, 2016/04/12
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Joel M. Halpern, 2016/04/12
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Ted Lemon, 2016/04/12
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Joel M. Halpern, 2016/04/12
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Ted Lemon, 2016/04/12
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Theodore V Faber, 2016/04/12
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Miles Fidelman, 2016/04/12
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Theodore V Faber, 2016/04/12
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Melinda Shore, 2016/04/12
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Andy Bierman, 2016/04/12
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Brian E Carpenter, 2016/04/12
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Alia Atlas, 2016/04/12
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Harald Alvestrand, 2016/04/13
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Yoav Nir, 2016/04/13
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Brian E Carpenter, 2016/04/13
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Loa Andersson, 2016/04/13
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Melinda Shore, 2016/04/12
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], chopps, 2016/04/12
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Melinda Shore, 2016/04/12
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Loa Andersson, 2016/04/12
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ted Lemon, 2016/04/11
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, George Michaelson, 2016/04/11
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ted Lemon, 2016/04/11
- Message not available
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Tim Chown, 2016/04/12
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Loa Andersson, 2016/04/12
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ted Lemon, 2016/04/12
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Dhruv Dhody, 2016/04/12
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ted Lemon, 2016/04/12
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ole Jacobsen, 2016/04/12
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Jeffrey Haas, 2016/04/13
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ted Lemon, 2016/04/13
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Rich Kulawiec, 2016/04/12
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, HANSEN, TONY L, 2016/04/12
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Rich Kulawiec, 2016/04/13
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Theodore V Faber, 2016/04/13
- Message not available
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Tim Chown, 2016/04/12
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ted Lemon, 2016/04/12
- Message not available
- Virtual IETFs (was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), Tim Chown, 2016/04/12
- Re: Virtual IETFs (was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), Ted Lemon, 2016/04/12
- Re: Virtual IETFs (was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), Alia Atlas, 2016/04/12
- Re: Virtual IETFs (was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), Tim Chown, 2016/04/12
- Re: Virtual IETFs (was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), Ted Lemon, 2016/04/12
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Theodore V Faber, 2016/04/12
- Meetecho was Re: Concerns about Singapore, lloyd.wood, 2016/04/11
- Re: Meetecho was Re: Concerns about Singapore, Jared Mauch, 2016/04/11
- Re: Meetecho was Re: Concerns about Singapore, Mikael Abrahamsson, 2016/04/12
- Message not available
- Re: Meetecho was Re: Concerns about Singapore, Tim Chown, 2016/04/12
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, chopps, 2016/04/11
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Harald Alvestrand, 2016/04/11
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Dave Crocker, 2016/04/10
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, John G. Scudder, 2016/04/08
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ladislav Lhotka, 2016/04/08
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Leif Johansson, 2016/04/07
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Laurent Ciavaglia, 2016/04/07
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Bert Wijnen (IETF), 2016/04/07
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Randy Bush, 2016/04/07
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Leif Johansson, 2016/04/07
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Yoav Nir, 2016/04/07
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Leif Johansson, 2016/04/07
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Laurent Ciavaglia, 2016/04/07
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Leif Johansson, 2016/04/07
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Jared Mauch, 2016/04/07
- A distinction along Pete's dimensions (was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), John C Klensin, 2016/04/07
- Re: A distinction along Pete's dimensions, Dave Crocker, 2016/04/07
- Re: A distinction along Pete's dimensions, Ted Lemon, 2016/04/07
- Re: A distinction along Pete's dimensions, Jari Arkko, 2016/04/08
- Re: A distinction along Pete's dimensions, Ray Pelletier, 2016/04/08
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, John C Klensin, 2016/04/07
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ted Lemon, 2016/04/07
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Mikael Abrahamsson, 2016/04/08
- SV: Concerns about Singapore, Anne-Marie Eklund-Löwinder, 2016/04/08
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Patrik Fältström, 2016/04/08
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Andrew Allen, 2016/04/08
- Re: SV: Concerns about Singapore, Martin Rex, 2016/04/08
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Dirk-Willem van Gulik, 2016/04/08
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Toerless Eckert (eckert), 2016/04/08
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Stefan Winter, 2016/04/08
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, David Conrad, 2016/04/07
- Message not available
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Melinda Shore, 2016/04/07
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Andrew Allen, 2016/04/09
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Yoav Nir, 2016/04/09
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Melinda Shore, 2016/04/09
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, joel jaeggli, 2016/04/09
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Fred Baker (fred), 2016/04/09
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Melinda Shore, 2016/04/09
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Brian E Carpenter, 2016/04/09
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Melinda Shore, 2016/04/09
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, John C Klensin, 2016/04/09
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Brian E Carpenter, 2016/04/09
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ole Jacobsen, 2016/04/09
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Patrik Fältström, 2016/04/09
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, John C Klensin, 2016/04/09
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Warren Kumari, 2016/04/09
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Andrew Allen, 2016/04/10
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, nalini.elkins, 2016/04/10
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Spencer Dawkins at IETF, 2016/04/10
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ole Jacobsen, 2016/04/10
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Spencer Dawkins at IETF, 2016/04/10
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, nalini.elkins, 2016/04/08
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Yoav Nir, 2016/04/08
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Paul Wouters, 2016/04/08
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Fred Baker (fred), 2016/04/08
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ole Jacobsen, 2016/04/08
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Michael Richardson, 2016/04/08
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Dave Crocker, 2016/04/08
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Andrew Allen, 2016/04/08
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Yoav Nir, 2016/04/08
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Dave Crocker, 2016/04/08
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ole Jacobsen, 2016/04/08
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Harish Pillay, 2016/04/08
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Randy Bush, 2016/04/09
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ole Jacobsen, 2016/04/09
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Yoav Nir, 2016/04/09
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Michael Richardson, 2016/04/08
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ole Jacobsen, 2016/04/08
- Follow-ups: Concerns about Singapore, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata), 2016/04/08
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Randy Bush, 2016/04/09
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, John C Klensin, 2016/04/09
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Andrew Allen, 2016/04/10
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Andrew Allen, 2016/04/10
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, David Morris, 2016/04/08
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Harish Pillay, 2016/04/08
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Harish Pillay, 2016/04/08
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Donald Eastlake, 2016/04/07
"We did not know" is not a good excuse,
Adrian Farrel,
2016/04/06
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Dave Crocker, 2016/04/06
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Melinda Shore, 2016/04/06
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Harish Pillay, 2016/04/06
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Melinda Shore, 2016/04/06
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Harish Pillay, 2016/04/07
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Melinda Shore, 2016/04/07
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Harish Pillay, 2016/04/07
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, lloyd.wood, 2016/04/07
- RE: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Adrian Farrel, 2016/04/06
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Dave Crocker, 2016/04/07
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Ted Lemon, 2016/04/07
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, John C Klensin, 2016/04/07
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Stefan Winter, 2016/04/07
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, John C Klensin, 2016/04/07
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, John Levine, 2016/04/07
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Dave Crocker, 2016/04/07
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Stewart Bryant, 2016/04/07
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Dave Crocker, 2016/04/07
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Stewart Bryant, 2016/04/07
- RE: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Adrian Farrel, 2016/04/07
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, HANSEN, TONY L, 2016/04/07
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, John C Klensin, 2016/04/07
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Lee Howard, 2016/04/11
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, John C Klensin, 2016/04/07
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Fred Baker (fred), 2016/04/07
Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"),
Brian E Carpenter,
2016/04/02
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Stephan Wenger, 2016/04/03
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), joel jaeggli, 2016/04/02
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Eggert, Lars, 2016/04/04
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Barry Leiba, 2016/04/04
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Stephan Wenger, 2016/04/04
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Barry Leiba, 2016/04/04
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Barry Leiba, 2016/04/04
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Spencer Dawkins at IETF, 2016/04/04
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), John C Klensin, 2016/04/04
- RE: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Michael Cameron, 2016/04/04
- RE: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), John C Klensin, 2016/04/04
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Stephan Wenger, 2016/04/04
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Scott Bradner, 2016/04/04
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Stephan Wenger, 2016/04/04
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Barry Leiba, 2016/04/04
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), joel jaeggli, 2016/04/04
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Ben Campbell, 2016/04/04
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), joel jaeggli, 2016/04/05
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), John C Klensin, 2016/04/04
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Brian E Carpenter, 2016/04/04
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Jari Arkko, 2016/04/04
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Alissa Cooper, 2016/04/11
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), John C Klensin, 2016/04/04
- RE: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Michael Cameron, 2016/04/04
- RE: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), John C Klensin, 2016/04/05
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Stephan Wenger, 2016/04/05
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Pete Resnick, 2016/04/11
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Jari Arkko, 2016/04/25
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Stephan Wenger, 2016/04/25
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Pete Resnick, 2016/04/29
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Stephan Wenger, 2016/04/29
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Stewart Bryant, 2016/04/30
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Brian E Carpenter, 2016/04/30
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), John C Klensin, 2016/04/12
- RE: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), John C Klensin, 2016/04/13