ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-nomcom-procexp-00.txt

2016-04-09 16:15:02

Brian E Carpenter <brian(_dot_)e(_dot_)carpenter(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
    > I think this is too general and judgmental. Suggestion:

    > 3.  A new reason to challenge a selection is that a specific member
    > who has not attended three of the last five meetings of the IETF
    > does not have enough recent participation of any kind to be an
    > effective member of the NomCom.  Such a challenge must be
    > accompanied by a specific explanation of why the challenger
    > considers this to be the case.

Is this challenge public?
I think that it is, but I'm not certain if all of it is public.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF(_at_)sandelman(_dot_)ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature