IETF Discussion (date)
April 27, 2016
- Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice, Joe Touch, 13:28
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-05.txt> (Requirements for Subscription to YANG Datastores) to Proposed Standard, Eric Voit (evoit), 13:15
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-05.txt> (Requirements for Subscription to YANG Datastores) to Proposed Standard, tom p., 12:03
- Re: [95all] IETF-95 summary articles, Linda Klieforth, 08:03
- Re: [95all] IETF-95 summary articles, Linda Klieforth, 08:02
- IETF-95 summary articles, IETF Chair, 04:59
April 22, 2016
- Re: [aqm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-11.txt> (AQM Characterization Guidelines) to Informational RFC, Wesley Eddy, 15:48
- Re: Spam catcher, Niels Dettenbach (Syndicat.com), 15:07
- Re: Spam catcher, John Levine, 11:39
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration (off-topic), Corinne Cath, 06:30
- Re: Spam catcher, Dave Cridland, 05:45
- Spam catcher, Howard Hong, 04:48
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration (off-topic), S Moonesamy, 04:46
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, lloyd.wood, 01:46
April 21, 2016
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, narten, 23:53
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 18:51
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Ross Finlayson, 18:12
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 17:09
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, nalini.elkins, 14:42
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Yoav Nir, 14:13
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Spencer Dawkins at IETF, 12:31
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Adam Roach, 12:12
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, nalini.elkins, 11:41
- RE: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice, Adrian Farrel, 10:11
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Ted Lemon, 09:55
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 09:51
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Mary Barnes, 07:08
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-ietf-pce-iro-update-06, Jari Arkko, 00:10
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-mib-08, Jari Arkko, 00:04
April 20, 2016
- Re: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-mib-08, vinays, 21:44
- Re: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-mib-08, vinays, 21:42
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Melinda Shore, 21:10
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Adam Roach, 20:08
- Re: [aqm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-11.txt> (AQM Characterization Guidelines) to Informational RFC, Dave Täht, 15:26
- Re: [IAB] Call for Comment: <draft-iab-rfc3677bis> (IETF ISOC Board of Trustee Appointment Procedures), Scott O. Bradner, 15:14
- Re: [IAB] Call for Comment: <draft-iab-rfc3677bis> (IETF ISOC Board of Trustee Appointment Procedures), Scott O. Bradner, 14:51
- Re: [IAB] Call for Comment: <draft-iab-rfc3677bis> (IETF ISOC Board of Trustee Appointment Procedures), Scott O. Bradner, 14:41
- Re: [IAB] Call for Comment: <draft-iab-rfc3677bis> (IETF ISOC Board of Trustee Appointment Procedures), Russ Housley, 14:31
- Re: [IAB] Call for Comment: <draft-iab-rfc3677bis> (IETF ISOC Board of Trustee Appointment Procedures), Scott O. Bradner, 13:43
- Re: [IAB] Call for Comment: <draft-iab-rfc3677bis> (IETF ISOC Board of Trustee Appointment Procedures), Scott O. Bradner, 13:41
- Re: [IAB] Call for Comment: <draft-iab-rfc3677bis> (IETF ISOC Board of Trustee Appointment Procedures), Russ Housley, 13:19
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Stephan Wenger, 10:37
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Abdussalam Baryun, 10:36
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Melinda Shore, 10:11
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Abdussalam Baryun, 10:08
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, John Levine, 10:03
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, thomas nadeau, 08:27
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Harald Alvestrand, 05:49
April 19, 2016
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback — for sites currently under active consideration, Jari Arkko, 15:35
- Re: f2f and mailing list participation - a question for "newer" participants (Was: Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration), Joseph Lorenzo Hall, 14:54
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Christian O'Flaherty, 14:35
- f2f and mailing list participation - a question for "newer" participants (Was: Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration), Stephen Farrell, 14:08
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Ted Lemon, 13:59
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Vinayak Hegde, 13:57
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Melinda Shore, 13:44
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, nalini.elkins, 13:03
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Ted Lemon, 12:56
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Christian O'Flaherty, 12:37
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Ted Lemon, 07:03
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Corinne Cath, 03:49
- Re: [tsvwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-15.txt> (DSCP and other packet markings for WebRTC QoS) to Proposed Standard, Magnus Westerlund, 03:47
April 18, 2016
- RE: [Recentattendees] Interim step on meetings site feedback — for sites currently under active consideration, fred.clark, 15:16
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, nalini.elkins, 14:50
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, John Levine, 14:40
- Gen-ART review ofdraft-ietf-rtcweb-alpn-03, Russ Housley, 14:39
- A word about mailing lists Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback — for sites currently under active consideration, Leslie Daigle, 14:05
- Re: [tsvwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-15.txt> (DSCP and other packet markings for WebRTC QoS) to Proposed Standard, gorry, 13:58
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Dan Harkins, 13:54
- Re: Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-ietf-pce-iro-update-06, Dhruv Dhody, 12:54
- RE: Interim step on meetings site feedback — for sites currently under active consideration, Andrew Allen, 12:45
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Melinda Shore, 12:38
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback â?? for sites currently under active consideration, Dan Harkins, 12:09
- Interim step on meetings site feedback — for sites currently under active consideration, The IAOC, 11:16
- Nominations sought: Jonathan B. Postel Service Award 2016, IETF Administrative Director, 10:24
- RE: [tsvwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-15.txt> (DSCP and other packet markings for WebRTC QoS) to Proposed Standard, Black, David, 08:05
April 15, 2016
- Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message, John R Levine, 18:47
- Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees], Jared Mauch, 17:33
- Re: [89attendees] spam on old lists - was Fw: new important message, Dick Franks, 17:23
- Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message, Benson Schliesser, 16:04
- Re: Time to kill layer 2, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 14:56
- Re: IETF95 remote attendance, Stewart Bryant, 14:54
- Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 14:45
- Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message, John Leslie, 13:57
- Re: [89attendees] spam on old lists - was Fw: new important message, Carlos M. Martinez, 13:56
- Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message, ietf, 13:53
- Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 13:31
- Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message, David Morris, 13:25
- Re: Last Call: <draft-sheffer-rfc6982bis-00.txt> (Improving Awareness of Running Code: The Implementation Status Section) to Best Current Practice, Paul Hoffman, 13:05
- Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message, John Leslie, 12:54
- Re: [vmeet] IETF95 remote attendance, Meetecho IETF support, 12:45
- Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 12:27
- Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message (fwd), Dick Franks, 12:22
- Re: IETF95 remote attendance, Meetecho IETF support, 12:21
- spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message (fwd), paul, 12:12
- Re: [vmeet] IETF95 remote attendance, HANSEN, TONY L, 12:08
- Re: IETF95 remote attendance, Meetecho IETF support, 11:12
- Re: IETF95 remote attendance, Mikael Abrahamsson, 11:01
- Re: IETF95 remote attendance, Mikael Abrahamsson, 10:59
- Re: [vmeet] IETF95 remote attendance, Michael Richardson, 10:48
- Re: Time to kill layer 2, Ted Lemon, 10:37
- Re: Time to kill layer 2, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:29
- Re: Time to kill layer 2, Time Warner Cable, 10:08
- Re: [tsvwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-15.txt> (DSCP and other packet markings for WebRTC QoS) to Proposed Standard, Cullen Jennings, 09:48
- IETF95 Mentoring Counts, nalini.elkins, 08:50
- Re: IETF95 remote attendance, Meetecho IETF support, 07:08
- Re: IETF95 remote attendance, Simon Pietro Romano, 07:07
- Re: IETF95 remote attendance, Joseph Lorenzo Hall, 06:56
- Re: IETF95 remote attendance, Stewart Bryant, 06:18
- RE: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), S Moonesamy, 06:13
- IETF95 remote attendance, Meetecho IETF support, 06:04
- Re: Time to kill layer 2, Dimitri Staessens, 01:56
- Re: Time to kill layer 2, Dimitri Staessens, 01:37
April 14, 2016
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, narten, 23:53
- RE: Time to kill layer 2, Chaitanya D, 22:30
- Re: Time to kill layer 2, Carlos M. Martinez, 21:48
- Re: Time to kill layer 2, Ted Lemon, 16:57
- Re: Time to kill layer 2, Dimitri Staessens, 16:55
- Re: Time to kill layer 2, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 16:43
- Re: Time to kill layer 2, Brian E Carpenter, 15:24
- Remote Mentoring: Internet Draft Review Teams, nalini.elkins, 14:43
- Re: Time to kill layer 2, Ted Lemon, 11:56
- Re: Time to kill layer 2, Charlie Perkins, 11:55
- Re: Time to kill layer 2, Christopher Morrow, 11:54
- Re: [rtcweb] Last call redux: draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-26, Alissa Cooper, 11:43
- Re: Time to kill layer 2, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 11:32
- Re: Time to kill layer 2, Ted Lemon, 10:23
- Re: Time to kill layer 2, chopps, 09:15
- Re: Time to kill layer 2, Michael Richardson, 08:49
- Time to kill layer 2, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 07:59
April 13, 2016
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), John C Klensin, 18:28
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), John C Klensin, 18:16
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Brian E Carpenter, 16:10
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Brian E Carpenter, 15:27
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Brian E Carpenter, 15:13
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Stephan Wenger, 15:06
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Joel M. Halpern, 15:04
- RE: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Michael Cameron, 13:33
- RE: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), John C Klensin, 12:41
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Theodore V Faber, 09:50
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ted Lemon, 09:47
- Fw: new important message, bensons, 08:24
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Jeffrey Haas, 08:05
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Rich Kulawiec, 06:53
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Loa Andersson, 06:51
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Yoav Nir, 06:31
- Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places, tom p., 06:13
- Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places, Tony Finch, 05:06
- Re: UK blacklist (Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places), Tim Chown, 04:49
- Re: Transparency of IAOC, SM, 03:34
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Harald Alvestrand, 02:18
- Re: Virtual IETFs (was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), Daniel Ajike Chidi, 00:30
April 12, 2016
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Alia Atlas, 21:42
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Brian E Carpenter, 21:09
- Re: Transparency of IAOC, Randy Bush, 20:25
- Re: Transparency of IAOC, Stephen Farrell, 16:49
- Re: Transparency of IAOC, Scott O. Bradner, 16:45
- Re: Transparency of IAOC, Stephen Farrell, 16:34
- Re: UK blacklist (Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places), Christopher Morrow, 16:28
- UK blacklist (Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places), Harald Alvestrand, 16:10
- Re: Transparency of IAOC, Spencer Dawkins at IETF, 15:51
- Re: Transparency of IAOC, Ted Lemon, 15:36
- Re: Transparency of IAOC, Ted Lemon, 15:34
- Re: Transparency of IAOC, Brian E Carpenter, 15:32
- Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places, John R Levine, 15:17
- Re: Transparency of IAOC, SM, 15:07
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ted Lemon, 14:21
- Re: thank you, Carlos M. Martinez, 14:20
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Andy Bierman, 14:09
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Stewart Bryant, 13:57
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Melinda Shore, 13:37
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Melinda Shore, 13:34
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, HANSEN, TONY L, 13:33
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], chopps, 13:07
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], chopps, 13:01
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Melinda Shore, 12:59
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Theodore V Faber, 12:58
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Miles Fidelman, 12:42
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Theodore V Faber, 12:34
- RE: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Michael Cameron, 12:33
- Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 12:17
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Melinda Shore, 12:09
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Melinda Shore, 12:03
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ted Lemon, 12:02
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Dhruv Dhody, 11:55
- Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places, Ted Lemon, 11:53
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Alissa Cooper, 11:51
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Ted Lemon, 11:25
- Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 11:24
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Joel M. Halpern, 11:15
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Ted Lemon, 11:02
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Joel M. Halpern, 10:42
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Theodore V Faber, 10:03
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ole Jacobsen, 09:47
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Christian Hopps, 09:21
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Mary Barnes, 09:09
- Re: Virtual IETFs (was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), Ted Lemon, 08:48
- Re: Virtual IETFs (was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), Tim Chown, 08:42
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], chopps, 08:37
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ted Lemon, 08:35
- Re: Virtual IETFs (was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), Alia Atlas, 08:33
- Re: Virtual IETFs (was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), Ted Lemon, 08:23
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Loa Andersson, 08:19
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Loa Andersson, 07:50
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Rich Kulawiec, 07:47
- Re: Meetecho was Re: Concerns about Singapore, Tim Chown, 07:36
- Virtual IETFs (was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), Tim Chown, 07:31
- Re: Meetecho was Re: Concerns about Singapore, Mikael Abrahamsson, 07:20
- Transparency of IAOC, SM, 07:07
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], chopps, 06:58
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ted Lemon, 06:50
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Tim Chown, 06:43
- Re: thank you, Bert Wijnen (IETF), 06:21
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Tim Chown, 06:16
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Rich Kulawiec, 06:08
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Rich Kulawiec, 06:03
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), John C Klensin, 04:29
- Re: thank you, Leif Johansson, 03:04
April 11, 2016
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Harald Alvestrand, 23:28
- Re: thank you, Fernando Gont, 21:29
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ted Lemon, 19:51
- Re: 1000 person virtual meeting (Was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), Stephen Farrell, 19:45
- Re: Meetecho was Re: Concerns about Singapore, Jared Mauch, 19:44
- Re: 1000 person virtual meeting (Was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), Miles Fidelman, 19:34
- Re: 1000 person virtual meeting (Was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), Mark Andrews, 19:30
- Re: 1000 person virtual meeting (Was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), Stephen Farrell, 19:27
- Re: thank you, Richard Shockey, 19:26
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, George Michaelson, 19:19
- RE: thank you, Samita Chakrabarti, 19:17
- Re: 1000 person virtual meeting (Was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), Ted Lemon, 19:14
- Meetecho was Re: Concerns about Singapore, lloyd.wood, 19:09
- Re: 1000 person virtual meeting (Was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), David Farmer, 19:07
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ted Lemon, 18:55
- Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], chopps, 18:01
- 1000 person virtual meeting (Was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), Stephen Farrell, 17:47
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Rich Kulawiec, 17:34
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Alissa Cooper, 17:33
- Re: thank you, Greg Shepherd, 17:10
- thank you, Randy Bush, 16:47
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Jared Mauch, 16:10
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Richard Shockey, 16:04
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Pete Resnick, 12:17
- Hackathon results?, Paul Hoffman, 11:37
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, chopps, 09:52
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Dave Crocker, 09:37
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Joel M. Halpern, 09:35
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Stewart Bryant, 09:29
- Re: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-nomcom-procexp-00.txt, Michael Richardson, 09:25
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ted Lemon, 09:16
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Yoav Nir, 09:08
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Yoav Nir, 09:07
- Virtual Meetings, John Leslie, 08:59
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, John C Klensin, 08:53
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Lee Howard, 08:39
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ted Lemon, 08:02
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Yoav Nir, 07:18
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Rich Kulawiec, 05:45
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Stephen Farrell, 05:24
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Hutton, Andrew, 04:35
- RE: Concerns about Singapore, Andrew Allen, 03:05
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, John C Klensin, 02:12
April 10, 2016
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Vinayak Hegde, 21:24
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, chopps, 20:17
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Robert Withers, 18:15
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Michael StJohns, 15:59
- Re: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-nomcom-procexp-00.txt, Brian E Carpenter, 15:30
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Dave Crocker, 15:22
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Brian E Carpenter, 15:12
- Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places, John Levine, 13:20
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Jared Mauch, 12:53
- Re: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-nomcom-procexp-00.txt, John C Klensin, 11:59
- Re: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-nomcom-procexp-00.txt, John C Klensin, 11:44
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Spencer Dawkins at IETF, 11:43
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ole Jacobsen, 10:08
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Spencer Dawkins at IETF, 10:01
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Dave Crocker, 09:50
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Michael StJohns, 09:48
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Randy Bush, 09:46
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ole Jacobsen, 09:41
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Michael StJohns, 09:34
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Randy Bush, 08:56
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, chopps, 08:38
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, nalini.elkins, 08:12
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Leif Johansson, 05:42
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Andrew Allen, 01:36
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Andrew Allen, 00:27
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Andrew Allen, 00:27
April 09, 2016
- Re: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-nomcom-procexp-00.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy, 23:47
- Re: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-nomcom-procexp-00.txt, Brian E Carpenter, 22:53
- Re: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-nomcom-procexp-00.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy, 22:49
- Fwd: SecureSessionV1Server, Robert Withers, 22:21
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Brian E Carpenter, 20:07
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Warren Kumari, 18:32
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, John C Klensin, 18:03
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Randy Bush, 17:57
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Patrik Fältström, 17:37
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, John C Klensin, 17:36
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Melinda Shore, 16:17
- Re: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-nomcom-procexp-00.txt, Michael Richardson, 16:15
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Michael StJohns, 16:14
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ole Jacobsen, 16:05
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Brian E Carpenter, 15:56
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Melinda Shore, 14:18
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Fred Baker (fred), 14:01
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, joel jaeggli, 13:58
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Melinda Shore, 12:31
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Yoav Nir, 12:15
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Andrew Allen, 10:53
- Re: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-nomcom-procexp-00.txt, Yoav Nir, 09:46
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Yoav Nir, 09:13
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, John C Klensin, 08:50
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ole Jacobsen, 07:48
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Randy Bush, 07:08
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Randy Bush, 07:07
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Randy Bush, 07:05
- Re: China, Ole Jacobsen, 06:41
- Re: China, Stewart Bryant, 03:06
- Re: China, Ray Pelletier, 02:51
- Re: China, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 01:06
April 08, 2016
- Re: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-nomcom-procexp-00.txt, Brian E Carpenter, 23:19
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Harish Pillay, 20:32
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Harish Pillay, 20:24
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Harish Pillay, 20:22
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Fred Baker (fred), 16:18
- Follow-ups: Concerns about Singapore, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata), 15:57
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ole Jacobsen, 15:19
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, John G. Scudder, 15:14
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Michael Richardson, 14:48
- Re: China, Melinda Shore, 13:52
- Re: China, Ole Jacobsen, 13:24
- Re: China, Melinda Shore, 13:16
- Re: China, Ole Jacobsen, 13:11
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, David Morris, 13:09
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ole Jacobsen, 12:50
- Re: China, HANSEN, TONY L, 12:36
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Dave Crocker, 12:34
- Re: SV: Concerns about Singapore, Martin Rex, 11:38
- Re: China, Mary Barnes, 11:01
- Re: China, Ray Pelletier, 10:50
- Re: China, Tim Chown, 10:35
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Yoav Nir, 10:31
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Lucy Lynch, 10:22
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Murray S. Kucherawy, 10:19
- Re: China, Scott Bradner, 10:14
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Andrew Allen, 10:06
- Re: A distinction along Pete's dimensions, Ray Pelletier, 09:50
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Dave Crocker, 09:47
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Michael Richardson, 09:43
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Toerless Eckert (eckert), 09:41
- Re: China, Michael Richardson, 09:39
- RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tls-chacha20-poly1305-04 - resend, Roni Even, 09:37
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Andrew Allen, 09:31
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Stefan Winter, 09:08
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Ted Lemon, 09:08
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Michael Richardson, 09:01
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Michael Richardson, 09:00
- Re: China, Ted Lemon, 08:54
- Re: China, Jeffrey Haas, 08:35
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Michael Richardson, 08:32
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Patrik Fältström, 07:32
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Paul Wouters, 07:27
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tls-chacha20-poly1305-04 - resend, Sean Turner, 07:27
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Dirk-Willem van Gulik, 06:34
- SV: Concerns about Singapore, Anne-Marie Eklund-Löwinder, 06:29
- China, Ole Jacobsen, 06:29
- Re: A distinction along Pete's dimensions, Jari Arkko, 06:22
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Mikael Abrahamsson, 06:21
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ole Jacobsen, 06:20
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Murray S. Kucherawy, 05:55
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Yoav Nir, 05:45
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Yoav Nir, 05:41
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, nalini.elkins, 05:38
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ladislav Lhotka, 04:58
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, HANSEN, TONY L, 01:25
April 07, 2016
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, narten, 23:53
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Christian Hopps, 22:59
- Re: ITS BoF outcome - comment on charter (and raw minutes), Randall Gellens, 22:20
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Leif Johansson, 20:32
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Leif Johansson, 20:25
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Randy Bush, 20:18
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, HANSEN, TONY L, 18:52
- Re: A distinction along Pete's dimensions, Ted Lemon, 18:22
- Re: A distinction along Pete's dimensions, Dave Crocker, 18:19
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ted Lemon, 18:11
- A distinction along Pete's dimensions (was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), John C Klensin, 17:57
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Murray S. Kucherawy, 17:56
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, John C Klensin, 17:34
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, John C Klensin, 17:25
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, HANSEN, TONY L, 17:12
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Murray S. Kucherawy, 17:09
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Murray S. Kucherawy, 17:08
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, HANSEN, TONY L, 17:06
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Harald Alvestrand, 16:57
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Bert Wijnen (IETF), 16:28
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Yoav Nir, 16:24
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Jared Mauch, 16:24
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Laurent Ciavaglia, 16:23
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Leif Johansson, 16:22
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Murray S. Kucherawy, 16:21
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Laurent Ciavaglia, 16:19
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Brian E Carpenter, 16:09
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Harald Alvestrand, 15:58
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Michael Richardson, 15:53
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Dave Crocker, 15:52
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, John Levine, 15:50
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Leif Johansson, 15:49
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Melinda Shore, 15:45
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, David Conrad, 15:20
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ladislav Lhotka, 15:08
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Mikael Abrahamsson, 15:01
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Leif Johansson, 14:51
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Donald Eastlake, 14:45
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Dhruv Dhody, 14:42
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Leif Johansson, 14:12
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:35
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Stewart Bryant, 13:31
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Dhruv Dhody, 13:30
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Jeffrey Haas, 13:25
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Ted Lemon, 13:20
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:18
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Ted Lemon, 13:14
- Qualifying for NomCom, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:12
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, John C Klensin, 12:42
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Stefan Winter, 12:36
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Fred Baker (fred), 12:30
- RE: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Adrian Farrel, 12:16
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Adam Roach, 12:12
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Dave Crocker, 11:38
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, John C Klensin, 11:35
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Stewart Bryant, 11:31
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Ted Lemon, 10:39
- Concerns about Singapore, Jari Arkko, 10:35
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Dave Crocker, 10:19
- An update on IETF 100 planning, Leslie Daigle, 10:15
- Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-udp-return-path, Stewart Bryant, 09:17
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tls-chacha20-poly1305-04 - resend, Roni Even, 07:51
- Re: Proposed New Note Well, John C Klensin, 07:51
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tls-chacha20-poly1305-04 - resend, Roni Even, 07:41
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, lloyd.wood, 03:23
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, John C Klensin, 02:53
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Harish Pillay, 00:58
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Melinda Shore, 00:32
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Harish Pillay, 00:18
April 06, 2016
- RE: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Adrian Farrel, 23:32
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Melinda Shore, 22:47
- Re: Proposed New Note Well, Pete Resnick, 22:27
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Harish Pillay, 22:12
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Melinda Shore, 21:38
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Dave Crocker, 21:19
- "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Adrian Farrel, 18:35
- Re: ITS BoF outcome - comment on charter (and raw minutes), Alexandre Petrescu, 18:04
- Re: Proposed New Note Well, Tim Chown, 18:02
- Re: Proposed New Note Well, Scott Bradner, 17:37
- Re: Proposed New Note Well, Pete Resnick, 17:34
- ITS BoF outcome - comment on charter, Alexandre Petrescu, 17:17
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06, Peter Yee, 14:17
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06, Luigi Iannone, 10:15
April 05, 2016
- Re: I-D Action: draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt, Terry Manderson, 12:07
- Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt, Barry Leiba, 11:42
- FW: I-D Action: draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt, Adrian Farrel, 10:27
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), joel jaeggli, 10:22
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Stephan Wenger, 08:29
- RE: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), John C Klensin, 02:46
April 04, 2016
- RE: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Michael Cameron, 19:31
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), John C Klensin, 18:23
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), joel jaeggli, 16:08
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Barry Leiba, 15:58
- Re: [95all] IETF 95 Agenda Changes, Randy Bush, 15:57
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Stephan Wenger, 15:48
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Scott Bradner, 15:47
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Jari Arkko, 15:29
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Brian E Carpenter, 15:17
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Stephan Wenger, 15:07
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), John C Klensin, 14:16
- RE: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), John C Klensin, 13:44
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Ben Campbell, 12:53
- RE: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Michael Cameron, 11:46
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), John C Klensin, 11:00
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Spencer Dawkins at IETF, 10:24
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Barry Leiba, 09:39
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Barry Leiba, 09:27
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Stephan Wenger, 09:16
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Barry Leiba, 08:43
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Stephan Wenger, 08:14
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Eggert, Lars, 07:42
April 03, 2016
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Brian E Carpenter, 23:56
- Re: RFC 7776 and the team that can be reached for help regarding harassment concerns, Niels ten Oever, 23:26
- Re: storage space at meeting (wardrobe)?, Andrew Allen, 17:25
- Re: storage space at meeting (wardrobe)?, Christopher Morrow, 17:01
- RE: [tsvwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-15.txt> (DSCP and other packet markings for WebRTC QoS) to Proposed Standard, Black, David, 16:38
- Re: Uppercase question for RFC2119 words, Francis Dupont, 14:04
- Report from the IAB before IETF 95, IAB Chair, 13:38
- Re: Remote participants, registration, and mailing lists -- unintended consequences, Dave Crocker, 11:57
- storage space at meeting (wardrobe)?, Alexandre Petrescu, 10:54
- Re: Remote participants, registration, and mailing lists -- unintended consequences, Ray Pelletier, 10:53
- Remote participants, registration, and mailing lists -- unintended consequences, John C Klensin, 10:29
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Stephan Wenger, 09:33
- Re: Fuzzy words [was Uppercase question for RFC2119 words], Abdussalam Baryun, 08:19
- Remote participation in IAB workshops, Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr), 07:58
April 02, 2016
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), joel jaeggli, 21:57
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology"), Brian E Carpenter, 19:59
- Re: RFC 7776 and the team that can be reached for help regarding harassment concerns, joel jaeggli, 15:56
- Gen-ART IETF Last Call review of draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case-04, Dale R. Worley, 14:32
- Re: Changes regarding IETF website CDN settings and TOR networks, Linus Nordberg, 09:53
- Re: RFC 7776 and the team that can be reached for help regarding harassment concerns, Olle E. Johansson, 01:24
April 01, 2016
- Re: [Recentattendees] Remote Participation for IETF 95: Meetecho Details, Stephen Farrell, 13:31
- Re: [Recentattendees] Remote Participation for IETF 95: Meetecho Details, John C Klensin, 12:25
- RFC 7776 and the team that can be reached for help regarding harassment concerns, IETF Chair, 11:53
- Re: [Recentattendees] Remote Participation for IETF 95: Meetecho Details, Jari Arkko, 11:13
- Re: [rtcweb] Uppercase question for RFC2119 words, Lee Howard, 11:08
- Re: [Recentattendees] Remote Participation for IETF 95: Meetecho Details, John C Klensin, 10:47
- Re: [rtcweb] Uppercase question for RFC2119 words, tom p., 05:37
- Re: [Recentattendees] Remote Participation for IETF 95: Meetecho Details, Stephen Farrell, 05:13
- Re: [Recentattendees] Remote Participation for IETF 95: Meetecho Details, Alexandre Petrescu, 04:57
- Re: [Recentattendees] Remote Participation for IETF 95: Meetecho Details, Tobias Gondrom, 04:23
- Re: [Recentattendees] Remote Participation for IETF 95: Meetecho Details, Rich Kulawiec, 02:25
- Re: Changes regarding IETF website CDN settings and TOR networks, Joseph Lorenzo Hall, 00:33