Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse

ietf

Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse

2016-04-07 12:30:41

On Apr 6, 2016, at 8:34 PM, adrian(_at_)olddog(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk wrote:

How do we move on so:
- this problem stops being a problem for IETF 100
- this problem does not recur


That would be a very relevant conversation on mtgvenue(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org.

signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, (continued) Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, John Levine Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Dave Crocker Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Stewart Bryant Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Dave Crocker Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Stewart Bryant RE: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Adrian Farrel Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, HANSEN, TONY L Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, John C Klensin Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Lee Howard Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, John C Klensin Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Fred Baker (fred) <=

Previous by Date:	RE: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Adrian Farrel
Next by Date:	Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, Stefan Winter
Previous by Thread:	Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse, John C Klensin
Next by Thread:	Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tls-chacha20-poly1305-04 - resend, Roni Even
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]