-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 4/12/16 10:42, Miles Fidelman wrote:
On 4/12/16 1:33 PM, Theodore V Faber wrote:
(Just to forestall the question: Anonymous seems to run entirely
on large scale telepresence (for some definition thereof). It's
got a whole set of procedures and traditions that enable that.
It's a fascinating situation, but I see little inspiration or
intuition for changing IETF procedures from it.)
I would think that a major open source project might be more of an
example - perhaps Debian?
I don't want to get too far down this particular rathole, but in my
experience a lot of those organizations do have a significant
component of their interactions at conventions/conferences. (Not in
the sense that total time is spent there, but that key interactions
occur there.) Most organizations (probably even Anonymous) sit
somewhere on a spectrum between face-to-face and online interactions.
I'd rather not build a taxonomy, though.
- --
Ted Faber <theodore(_dot_)v(_dot_)faber(_at_)aero(_dot_)org>
Engineering Specialist
Computer Systems Research Department
310-336-7373
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org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=q+9F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----