Re: Concerns about Singapore

Calling the Beijing meeting network open isn't really correct - we had
a reverse VPN to the Internet as it exists outside of the PRC.


false.  and i was the noc guy working it.

We did registration in Maastricht simply to figure out the details
before we got to Beijing - I'm fairly confident that Maastricht
wouldn't have been different from the previous IETF's without the
upcoming Beijing meeting.


correct, but misleading.  maastrict was the same as beijing, though for
different reasons.

randy

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: China, (continued) Re: China, Ray Pelletier Re: China, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ Re: China, Ray Pelletier Re: China, Stewart Bryant Re: China, Ole Jacobsen Re: China, Mary Barnes Re: China, HANSEN, TONY L Re: Concerns about Singapore, Michael Richardson Re: Concerns about Singapore, Randy Bush Re: Concerns about Singapore, Michael StJohns Re: Concerns about Singapore, Randy Bush <= Re: Concerns about Singapore, Leif Johansson Re: Concerns about Singapore, chopps Re: Concerns about Singapore, Randy Bush Re: Concerns about Singapore, Michael StJohns Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ole Jacobsen Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places, John Levine Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places, Phillip Hallam-Baker Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places, Ted Lemon Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places, Phillip Hallam-Baker Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places, John R Levine

Previous by Date:	Re: Concerns about Singapore, Patrik Fältström
Next by Date:	Re: Concerns about Singapore, John C Klensin
Previous by Thread:	Re: Concerns about Singapore, Michael StJohns
Next by Thread:	Re: Concerns about Singapore, Leif Johansson
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]