No, outcome 1 says to use the criteria in section 2 directly as specified
there. Outcome 4 lets us twiddle it.
Tony
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy"
<superuser(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com<mailto:superuser(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>>
Date: Thursday, April 7, 2016 at 6:09 PM
To: Tony Hansen <tony(_at_)att(_dot_)com<mailto:tony(_at_)att(_dot_)com>>
Cc: ietf <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org<mailto:ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>>
Subject: Re: Qualifying for NomCom
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:06 PM, HANSEN, TONY L
<tony(_at_)att(_dot_)com<mailto:tony(_at_)att(_dot_)com>> wrote:
There's a fourth possible outcome: we've gathered enough information from the
experiment that we know what we want to do and don't need to re-run another
experiment in order to revise 7437.
Isn't that the same as the first outcome?
-MSK