Re: Concerns about Singapore

Hi,

There are no perfect places to go. Except Minneapolis. ;)


Too many LGBT unfriendlies there as well, it seems. For some reason, I
get what I consider spam, but others might not about "Minnesota for
Marriage". Luckily, their website is currently down for maintenance. And
I don't think anyone wants or the content warrants a forward of their
pamphlets.

Stefan

0x8A39DC66.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: A distinction along Pete's dimensions, (continued) Re: A distinction along Pete's dimensions, Ray Pelletier Re: Concerns about Singapore, John C Klensin Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ted Lemon Re: Concerns about Singapore, Mikael Abrahamsson SV: Concerns about Singapore, Anne-Marie Eklund-Löwinder Re: Concerns about Singapore, Patrik Fältström Re: Concerns about Singapore, Andrew Allen Re: SV: Concerns about Singapore, Martin Rex Re: Concerns about Singapore, Dirk-Willem van Gulik Re: Concerns about Singapore, Toerless Eckert (eckert) Re: Concerns about Singapore, Stefan Winter <= Re: Concerns about Singapore, David Conrad Message not available Re: Concerns about Singapore, Melinda Shore Re: Concerns about Singapore, Andrew Allen Re: Concerns about Singapore, Yoav Nir Re: Concerns about Singapore, Melinda Shore Re: Concerns about Singapore, joel jaeggli Re: Concerns about Singapore, Fred Baker (fred) Re: Concerns about Singapore, Melinda Shore Re: Concerns about Singapore, Brian E Carpenter Re: Concerns about Singapore, Melinda Shore

Previous by Date:	Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Ted Lemon
Next by Date:	Re: Concerns about Singapore, Andrew Allen
Previous by Thread:	Re: Concerns about Singapore, Toerless Eckert (eckert)
Next by Thread:	Re: Concerns about Singapore, David Conrad
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]