Re: Concerns about Singapore



On 8 Apr 2016, at 13:28, Anne-Marie Eklund-Löwinder wrote:

The law is from the 1920ies or so. No one bothered to change it.


This legislation is now to be removed.

The parliament of Sweden is discussing the issue on April 14 2016.

   paf

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Concerns about Singapore, (continued) Re: Concerns about Singapore, Jared Mauch A distinction along Pete's dimensions (was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), John C Klensin Re: A distinction along Pete's dimensions, Dave Crocker Re: A distinction along Pete's dimensions, Ted Lemon Re: A distinction along Pete's dimensions, Jari Arkko Re: A distinction along Pete's dimensions, Ray Pelletier Re: Concerns about Singapore, John C Klensin Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ted Lemon Re: Concerns about Singapore, Mikael Abrahamsson SV: Concerns about Singapore, Anne-Marie Eklund-Löwinder Re: Concerns about Singapore, Patrik Fältström <= Re: Concerns about Singapore, Andrew Allen Re: SV: Concerns about Singapore, Martin Rex Re: Concerns about Singapore, Dirk-Willem van Gulik Re: Concerns about Singapore, Toerless Eckert (eckert) Re: Concerns about Singapore, Stefan Winter Re: Concerns about Singapore, David Conrad Message not available Re: Concerns about Singapore, Melinda Shore Re: Concerns about Singapore, Andrew Allen Re: Concerns about Singapore, Yoav Nir Re: Concerns about Singapore, Melinda Shore

Previous by Date:	Re: Concerns about Singapore, Paul Wouters
Next by Date:	Re: Concerns about Singapore, Michael Richardson
Previous by Thread:	SV: Concerns about Singapore, Anne-Marie Eklund-Löwinder
Next by Thread:	Re: Concerns about Singapore, Andrew Allen
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]