On Apr 4, 2016, at 1:28 PM, Jari Arkko
<jari(_dot_)arkko(_at_)piuha(_dot_)net> wrote:
Well, *exactly*. That's why I don't think that ADs or WGCs need to
be called out in any particular way: they participate and therefore
if they are reasonably and personally aware of IPR, they must disclose
(and if they can't disclose, they need to stop participating in
that particular case).
Right, and I think we all are actually in agreement over this.
Personally, I’d love to see the draft talk about AD participation just like
it talks about other people's participation. If I really haven’t participated
in WG X, well, I haven’t, even if my co-AD owns the group :-) And if I did
participate, well, I should declare the IPR that I know of :-)
+1
This is what did not make sense to me about the draft.
Alissa
Jari