ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration

2016-04-21 14:42:33
 Thanks, Spencer


On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:40 AM, 
<nalini(_dot_)elkins(_at_)insidethestack(_dot_)com> wrote:

 But, IMHO, I think a fruitful discussion might be: where do we see all this 
going?  That is, what do we think the IETF will look like in 3 years, 5 years, 
10 years?  The reason I say this is because I believe that informs our 
thinking.   Any business plans for (at least) 3 - 5 years down the road, why 
don't we at the IETF talk about it?


I don't know who noticed, or did not 
notice, https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-arkko-ietf-trends-and-observations/
(people who didn't notice it were probably preparing for IETF 95, which is >a 
reasonable alibi).
That draft is input to - not output from - people at the IETF talking about 
this, and it steers comments and feedback to the IETF mailing list, so I'd 
encourage people to comment and provide >feedback.

I took a quick look at that draft but then had a ton of other work to do.   I 
will re-read over the weekend and comment.
Thanks for pointing that out.
Nalini