Hi,
[This note is sent as part of the Facilitators experiment, to maximize the
effectiveness of discussions at the IETF-Discussion mailing list]
As this thread started with the concerns express during the plenary about
Singapore as a meeting venue, I wanted to summarize the arguments, and refocus
and redirect the discussion:
Several details on both the letter and the practicality of the Singapore law
that discriminates agains LGBTQ, and its implications, followed these
community-expressed concerns. A number of suggestions, recommendations, and
additional pieces of information about other countries and locations were also
shared.
The IAOC and its Meetings Committee acknowledged the issue, and shared a
two-point plan at [1].
Meeting venue selection and its associated criteria is naturally a relevant and
most important topic for the community. At this point, the most effective
channel for providing input and discussion is at the MTGVENUE mailing list [2]
[3], following the MTGVENUE BoF. That would ensure feedback and requirements
are appropriately captured.
Thanks!
— Carlos.
[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/hKwBYOwPkE6VTA4mxxf00NTLLF0
[2] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue
[3] mailto:mtgvenue(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail