Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message (fwd

ietf

Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message (fwd)

2016-04-15 12:22:59

On 15 April 2016 at 18:11, <paul(_at_)nohats(_dot_)ca> wrote:


Can we have a process where we disallow posting by _everyone_ on the
attendees lists of previous IETF meetings? I think after 4 months there
is no valid reason for allowing to post on those old lists anymore.


Is there any valid reason for the list to exist after 4 months?

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message (fwd), paul Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message (fwd), Dick Franks <= Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message, John Leslie Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message, David Morris Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message, ietf Re: [89attendees] spam on old lists - was Fw: new important message, Carlos M. Martinez Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message, Benson Schliesser Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message, John R Levine Re: [89attendees] spam on old lists - was Fw: new important message, Dick Franks Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message, John Leslie

Previous by Date:	Re: IETF95 remote attendance, Meetecho IETF support
Next by Date:	Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Previous by Thread:	spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message (fwd), paul
Next by Thread:	Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]