are we re-spinning the debate on a WG-agreed text ?
<tp>
Yes, and I am sure that that is exactly what is intended.
Then let's encourage people outside of 6man, with other points of view, and
other arguments to come forward.
A re-run of the discussions already had in 6man with the same arguments and the
same participants doesn't seem useful.
For a brief (sic) overview take a look at 672 messages already on the topic:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?q=header+insertion&f_list=ipv6
O.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP