Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08.txt> (Internet Protocol, V

> are we re-spinning the debate on a WG-agreed text ?
>
> <tp>
>
> Yes, and I am sure that that is exactly what is intended.
Then let's encourage people outside of 6man, with other points of view, and 
other arguments to come forward.

A re-run of the discussions already had in 6man with the same arguments and the 
same participants doesn't seem useful.

For a brief (sic) overview take a look at 672 messages already on the topic:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?q=header+insertion&f_list=ipv6

O.

signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP