ietf
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets

2017-02-24 04:50:02
from [Sander Steffann] [Permanent Link] 
Hi,


something like a /96 would have served the aspect "more machines than you can
imagine per subnet" perfectly well.


Yeah, I wish we had chose something like that in the past as well :(

Cheers,
Sander

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Last Call Summary on <draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10.txt> (Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology) to Best Current Practice, Stewart Bryant
Next by Date:  Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard, Philip Homburg
Previous by Thread:  Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets, Yoav Nir
Next by Thread:  Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets, Christopher Morrow
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]