I believe Julian and Barry's notes constitute an appeal of the Protocol
Action, and I think they're probably right. Please rescind it, publish
the new draft, and give people a bit to review. No need for another
formal LC, but doing this in a note to the RFC Editor isn't kosher.
On 18 Jul 2017, at 13:04, Barry Leiba wrote:
I have to agree with Julian here: this is not a change that's
appropriate to do in an RFC Editor note. The change is probably fine,
but draft revisions are cheap and it's easy enough to post a revised
I-D to make sure we can all see the final version in context.
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Julian Reschke
On 2017-07-18 10:05, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
On 18 Jul 2017, at 08:52, Julian Reschke <julian(_dot_)reschke(_at_)gmx(_dot_)de>
On 2017-07-17 18:33, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
The JSONBIS WG decided to update recommendation on Unicode
be UTF-8. (For details see the RFC Editor's notes in the approval
message that will be sent out shortly.) This took a bit of time to
debate in the WG, so the document approval took a bit longer than
Alexey, as the responsible AD
The last WG mail related to this topic is over 2 months old, and I
see any declaration of consensus.
It would be good if the chair would send a summary about what's
to the WG mailing list before anything gets finalized.
(I note that
saying "Revised ID Needed" for 48 days, and I was under the
there'd be indeed a revised ID).
I just posted a message on this: this is approved with updated RFC
notes. See the approval message once it is sent.
This is not how it's supposed to work. Please have a new I-D posted
people to review the changes in context. This is a *very* important
standards work - we need to make sure it meets quality standards.
From a quick glance at
already note that the appendix "Changes from RFC 7159" is now
Best regards, Julian
json mailing list