Hi Hadmut,
Is that really a matter of the "email" mechanism or just of the
transported content?
I think it needs to be addressed by the "email" mechanism, because if
the medium is unsecure, unreliable, untrustworthy, can make false
address claims, or be redirected to somewhere I don't intend it to go
(to give a few examples) email cannot be readily used for secure
purposes.
Ian Peter
Ian Peter and Associates Pty Ltd
P.O. Box 10670 Adelaide St
Brisbane 4000 Australia
Tel 61 7 3870 1181
Mobile 0419 667772
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-mail-ng(_at_)mail(_dot_)imc(_dot_)org
[mailto:owner-mail-ng(_at_)mail(_dot_)imc(_dot_)org]
On
Behalf Of Hadmut Danisch
Sent: Friday, 6 February 2004 4:44 PM
To: mail-ng(_at_)imc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: list of user-visible goals
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 11:45:51AM +1000,
ipeter(_at_)bigpond(_dot_)net(_dot_)au wrote:
Users want to use "email" for a range of secure financial
transactions.
(if that's not captured yet)
Is that really a matter of the "email" mechanism or just of the
transported content?
Hadmut