Tony Hansen wrote:
ooh, ooh, I know, I know (think Horschack or Screech, depending on your generation) The A-R header can be signed using dkim. Only half a :-) here.
The draft could offer that as a suggestion, I suppose, but I think I'd rather not provide specific guidance.
_______________________________________________NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [mail-vet-discuss] SHOULD the header be signed?, J D Falk |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [mail-vet-discuss] SHOULD the header be signed?, Scott Kitterman |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [mail-vet-discuss] SHOULD the header be signed?, Damon |
Next by Thread: | Re: [mail-vet-discuss] SHOULD the header be signed?, Eric Allman |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |