I'd be fine being generic and saying the administrator has to find some way to secure that channel. In fact, I think that's where we are now
Me too. That is where we are now. This would be good enough IMO. Arvel _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
| Previous by Date: | Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Discussion of auth-header draft (fwd), Murray S. Kucherawy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Discussion of auth-header draft (fwd), Tony Hansen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [mail-vet-discuss] DKIM dependency, Alexey Melnikov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [mail-vet-discuss] DKIM dependency, Michael Thomas |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |