Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
I used the IMAP annotations method described in RFC257 in the draft I made to cover this stuff in the IMAP case. Was that the right thing to do? Alas, IMAP is not yet one of my strong suits.
Make that RFC5257. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
Previous by Date: | Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Discussion of auth-header draft (fwd), Murray S. Kucherawy |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [mail-vet-discuss] DKIM dependency, Arvel Hathcock |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Discussion of auth-header draft (fwd), Murray S. Kucherawy |
Next by Thread: | Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Discussion of auth-header draft (fwd), Tony Hansen |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |