Charles Lindsey wrote:
The spec doesn't actually mandate either of these. It sounds like the
IESG would likely want one or the other.
I would say the IESG are over-reacting a bit.
To be clear: I don't think IESG as a whole has expressed any opinion at
this point, so these are just speculations.
Actually, the best suggestion I have seen is that POP3/IMAP servers should
see to the matter. I realise that might not be easy for POP3, but IMAP is
already so bloated with extensions that another one would hardly be
noticed :-( .
:-)
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html