mail-vet-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Discussion of auth-header draft (fwd)

2008-10-11 13:15:29
Hi Murray,
Some quick comments about your IMAP proposal that uses ANNOTATE.

3.  IMAP Server Implementation

  An [IMAP] server conforming to this specification MUST implement
  [ANNOTATE] and MUST report these annotations to the client if they
  are attached to the message(s) being requested.
 

The second MUST: I am not sure what you are trying to say here. If you 
are saying that the new annotations must be reported whenever the 
corresponding message body is send (or similar), then that is not how 
the ANNOTATE extension works.
 [...]

5.1.  Formal Definition

  The content of the annotation, as defined using [ABNF], is as
  follows:

     authres = 1*( version ":" authserv-id ":" methodspec
                           ":" propspec )
             ; relays a single unit of authentication results
             ; information
 

Are you trying to list multiple authresults here? I think you are 
missing some delimiter between individual values, e.g. SP.

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>