mail-vet-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Discussion of auth-header draft (fwd)

2008-10-10 13:38:03
At 09:13 10-10-2008, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
Or rather "one wouldn't necessarily want to implement the whole
draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-esmtp-01.txt".

During a previous discussion, one participant stated that he wanted 
to make use of the information from Authentication-results: headers 
inserted by upstream MTAs (forwarding messages). What 
draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-esmtp-01 proposes is a SMTP extension for 
MTAs which support the proposal to transfer the 
Authentication-Results information.  That makes it easier to 
determine whether the sending MTA is providing that information and 
removal of "spoofed" Authentication-Results: headers.

But if the intention is that draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-esmtp-01 is the
mechanism for discovery, then the auth-header draft needs to be explicit
about that in the Security considerations section.

draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-esmtp-01 doesn't provide a discovery 
mechanism as what we have been discussing about.

Regards,
-sm  

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>