Tony Hansen wrote:
Yes, I also shuddered slightly when I suggested it. But it seemed to fit
the most with what was going on. IMAP/POP servers are what the MUA is
talking with; they *are* the representative for the MDA; and the MUA is
*already* talking with the IMAP/POP servers, so could easily ask for a
bit more information.
We can write it up and see if it flies. Here's how it could look:
IMAP
x CAPABILITY
x CAPABILITY Authentication-Results=isp.example.net
x OK CAPABILITY completed
POP3
CAPA
Authentication-Results=isp.example.net
I used the IMAP annotations method described in RFC257 in the draft I
made to cover this stuff in the IMAP case. Was that the right thing to
do? Alas, IMAP is not yet one of my strong suits.
Does anyone know if POP3 has a similar annotation extension, or do I
need to make a new one?
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html