Re: nmh and tcl

Chris Garrigues <cwg-dated-1028045524(_dot_)7c7f99(_at_)DeepEddy(_dot_)Com> 
wrote:

> If nmh were to include an mhsh which was tclsh with nmh commands, the
> state could be maintained in the shell instead of having to write
> everything out to temp files.

So mh-e would open a single process for this shell and pass all commands
through it?