From: Peter S Galbraith <GalbraithP(_at_)dfo-mpo(_dot_)gc(_dot_)ca>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 12:27:21 -0400
Chris Garrigues <cwg-dated-1028045524(_dot_)7c7f99(_at_)DeepEddy(_dot_)Com>
wrote:
If nmh were to include an mhsh which was tclsh with nmh commands, the
state could be maintained in the shell instead of having to write
everything out to temp files.
So mh-e would open a single process for this shell and pass all commands
through it?
Since I don't use mh-e, I hadn't thought about it, but that sounds logical.
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
virCIO http://www.virCIO.Com
716 Congress, Suite 200
Austin, TX 78701 +1 512 374 0500
World War III: The Wrong-Doers Vs. the Evil-Doers.
pgpgLV4GmS6vN.pgp
Description: PGP signature